Burnham hurt Guyana socially and economically

Oct 28, 2017 Letters

Dear Editor,
Laudable exhortations portraying the late Forbes Burnham as a prophet of so-called social cohesion in Guyana are risible, to say the least.
Burnham was a megalomaniac whose policy plunged the country into economic abyss. During Burnham’s dictatorship, the economic, social and moral conditions of the Guyanese people can rationally be encapsulated as the darkest period of post-independence Guyana.
This argument is supported by the following incontrovertible facts.
The blatant rigging of elections for two decades was well documented by the British Granada Television. In this expose Guyanese non-existent voters were deemed to be domiciled in cemeteries in Britain. There were other non-verifiable addresses.
During Burnham’s time, systemic kicking-down of doors of was the norms and this scourge led to mass migration of these hapless people. Far from being a person of social cohesion, Burnham and his ilk nurtured the concept of racial primacy based on the authoritarian idea of party paramountcy.
This vile doctrine was so entrenched that it accelerated racial fear rather than racial harmony. Assault on the Rule of Law and coercion of judges made the independence of the judiciary a mockery to the point that one of the pre-eminent jurist, Akbar Khan, found it necessary to migrate.
Dishonesty, manipulation, intimidation, and bold in his opportunistic utterances prompted Sir Nigel Fisher (Duncan Sandy’s Deputy) to characterise Burnham ‘’as twisted as a cork-crew‘’.
To intimidate the populace, Burnham harboured the crime fugitive Rabbi Washington whose reign of terror was all-pervasive.
The sycophants and apologists of Burnham cannot honestly palliate the wrongs of the Burnham’s regime. With cunning, they devise dubious claims of Burnham’s place in Guyana’s history.
It is worthy to note that the present state of lawlessness, corruption, bribery, suicide, domestic violence, day-time robbery and violation of the constitution is a continuum of an inherited past; and such moral squalor is only fascinating for its repugnance.
To write of Burnham’s legacy would occupy volumes and no effort to glorify the period of Burnham’s rule, would find sanction in an informed and elevated mind.
Albert Khan

Discover more from Kaieteur News

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Latest News