Latest update July 5th, 2026 12:45 AM
Jul 05, 2026 News
(Kaieteur News) – The Government of Suriname has publicly contradicted President Irfaan Ali’s assertion that Guyana has received no official communication about Paramaribo’s intention to finance the proposed Corentyne River bridge, insisting that the matter was clearly conveyed during several high-level bilateral engagements.
In a statement issued by Suriname’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, International Business and International Cooperation (BIS), the government said its intention to fully finance the bridge has been a standing topic in discussions with Guyana and was explicitly communicated to President Ali.

resident Irfaan Ali and Surinamese President Jennifer Geerlings-Simons during their engagement in 2025.
According to the ministry, the matter was discussed during the meeting between the two heads of state in Nickerie on 13th September, 2025; a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the 50th Regular Meeting of the Conference of Heads of Government of CARICOM in Saint Kitts and Nevis; and a virtual consultation between the two presidents on 15th May , 2026.
“During the most recent discussions, Suriname clearly indicated its intention to assume responsibility for financing the Corentyne River bridge,” the ministry said, adding that given the scale and strategic importance of the project, time is needed to carefully assess financing options and reach a sound arrangement. The ministry said these principles, along with Suriname’s intention to finance the bridge, were reaffirmed during the most recent bilateral consultation between the two heads of state. It was also agreed that technical working groups would jointly develop the financial, technical, and operational aspects of the project, including its future operation.
Speaking on the sidelines of a swearing-in ceremony for puisne judges on Wednesday, President Ali maintained that Guyana’s position remains unchanged and that the bridge remains a bilateral initiative.
“I have not received anything official, other than what’s already been placed in the media,” Ali said. “The Corentyne River bridge is a bridge that is being discussed jointly as a joint project by the Government of Guyana and the Government of Suriname. Guyana is interested in being part of a project that covers two sovereign states in a joint manner. That has always been our vision.”
Ali also said river operations remain unaffected by the diplomatic exchange, noting he had confirmed with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs that no recent complaints had been reported by operators or users of the river.
The disagreement followed comments from Surinamese Minister of Public Works and Spatial Planning Stephen Tsang, who announced during a parliamentary budget debate that Suriname would bypass the shared bilateral framework and finance the bridge independently. According to Surinamese outlet Star Nieuws, Tsang told legislators the government had decided to finance the bridge entirely on its own, stating, “It must and will be a Surinamese bridge.”
Tsang acknowledged that solo financing would effectively reset the project’s timeline, and that depending on the financial model chosen by Suriname’s Ministry of Finance — which is exploring toll mechanisms — a new international tender process may be required.
Ali indicated that his administration does not consider a minister’s parliamentary remarks an official change in state-to-state policy. He said he was operating on recent commitments made directly to him by Surinamese President Jennifer Geerlings-Simons, who he said had assured him that Suriname was simply finalising its side of the existing legal framework while Guyana had already completed its administrative preparations.
“There is only one thing we’re interested in and that is the joint development of the bridge and that was the arrangement from day one,” Ali said, adding that he would “pronounce decisively” if an official request to alter the agreement is made.
Guyana’s Minister of Public Works, Juan Edghill, declined to add further comment when approached. “The president has already commented, I have nothing further to say on the matter,” he said.
The proposed 3.1-kilometre bridge across the Corentyne River is intended to replace the ageing ferry connection between South Drain, Suriname, and Moleson Creek, Guyana, linking the two oil-producing neighbours with eventual connections to French Guiana and Brazil. Last year, both heads of state issued a joint statement describing the project’s “transformative potential” for regional trade, tourism, and connectivity within the Amazon region.
The Surinamese Public Works Minister has not clarified how the announced shift to solo financing would affect existing bilateral treaties governing the project.
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Your children are starving, and you giving away their food to an already fat pussycat.
Jul 05, 2026
– West Indies trail by 491 runs (Cricinfo) – Sri Lanka batted a touch over two sessions on day two before eventually declaring on 549 for 9, while West Indies in their response ended the...Jul 05, 2026
(Kaieteur News) – The PNCR is increasingly becoming less of a political party and more of a habit – a habit of disappointment. The party, now speaking loosely, through what was once APNU, has adopted the language of those who have exhausted the present and must therefore reimagine the past....Jul 05, 2026
By Sir Ronald Sanders (Kaieteur News) – Two hundred and fifty years ago, in the sweltering heat of a Philadelphia summer, a small group of men did something without precedent in modern history. They gathered, argued, deliberated, and then signed their names to a declaration that was a...Jul 05, 2026
Hard Truths by GHK Lall… (Kaieteur News) – No one could have done it as clinically and comprehensively as Chartered Accountant, Mr. Chris Ram. He took a scalpel to Exxon, the oil contract, and political leaders. Dissected all three with much blood drawn. The contract, the regulatory...Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: glennlall2000@gmail.com / kaieteurnews@yahoo.com