Latest update August 8th, 2026 12:30 AM
Latest News
- ‘No new oil projects until Guyana gets full 50% profits’ – APNU tells Govt.
- Two dead in Water Street brawl
- “We will follow you wherever you go” – opposition vows to beef up protests against government
- Trump says war ‘can’t go much longer’
- Guyana’s oil helps cushion impacts from Middle East disruption – Exxon
Sham Tender
Editorial…
(Kaieteur News) – The leaked proposal for the salvage of the MV Barima reeks of the same secrecy and backdoor dealings that have become all too familiar in Guyana.
If the Government had already invited a Dutch company to submit an US$8 million proposal days before publicly advertising for bids, then what exactly was the purpose of the later Request for Proposals? Was it genuine competition or merely a stage-managed exercise to create the illusion of transparency?
According to the leaked document, the Government of Guyana, through the Maritime Administration Department, invited a Dutch company to submit a proposal on July 28—days before the official Request for Proposals was publicly issued on August 2. If this document is authentic, it raises a simple but unavoidable question: was the public tender ever intended to be a genuine competition?
The timing cannot be ignored. The company states plainly in its own executive summary that it had been invited by the Government to submit a proposal for the recovery of the vessel. It even presented a detailed technical plan and an estimated price tag of US$8 million. If one company was already engaged before the tender opened, were other firms also privately approached? If they were not, how can there be any claim of equal treatment?
These are not trivial questions. They strike at the heart of transparency, accountability and public trust.
The MV Barima disaster claimed lives, shattered families and exposed glaring weaknesses in Guyana’s maritime safety regime. The recovery of the vessel is not simply another government project. It is a critical part of uncovering the truth. The wreck is evidence. Every decision surrounding its recovery must therefore withstand the highest level of public scrutiny.
Instead, what the public is seeing is another familiar pattern. Decisions appear to be made behind closed doors, while formal procedures seem designed merely to rubber-stamp what has already been decided. Increasingly, official processes resemble carefully choreographed performances rather than genuine exercises in openness.
This perception is damaging. It feeds the growing belief that in Guyana, competitive bidding is too often little more than a public relations exercise. Invitations are issued after the preferred contractor has already been identified, leaving everyone else to participate in a contest whose outcome may already be known.
The Government now owes the nation clear answers. Who authorised the invitation to the Dutch company? Was Cabinet informed? Were other salvage firms similarly invited before the Request for Proposals was published? If not, why not? What procurement rules permit such an arrangement? Silence will only deepen suspicion.
The issue extends beyond one contract. It reflects a broader concern about governance in Guyana. Too many controversies have emerged in recent years over procurement, sole sourcing, unexplained contract awards and opaque decision-making. Individually, each may be defended. Collectively, they paint a picture of a system where transparency is increasingly questioned and confidence steadily eroded.
The tragedy of the MV Barima should never become another chapter in that troubling story. The families who lost loved ones deserve to know that every aspect of the investigation and recovery is above reproach. The Commission of Inquiry cannot be expected to restore public confidence if the processes surrounding the salvage operation are themselves clouded by allegations of preferential treatment.
Governments often insist that they have nothing to hide. If that is indeed the case, then this matter should be resolved with full disclosure. Publish every communication, every invitation, every proposal and every evaluation relating to the salvage contract. Let the public judge whether the process was fair or merely a carefully staged exercise.
Guyanese have grown weary of the recurring scent of secrecy surrounding public business. Every new revelation reinforces the belief that too much of what happens in this country occurs through back channels rather than open doors.
Share this:
Discover more from Kaieteur News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Similar Articles
Blunt of the day
Sports
Features/Columnists
Sir. Ronald Sanders
The GHK Lall Column
Weekend Cartoon
