Latest update July 22nd, 2026 12:47 AM
Latest News
- MV Barima Disaster… Death toll now pegged at 103
- Another boat calamity… Several injured, captain critical after boat collision in Canje River
- Opposition Leader calls for Edghill’s resignation
- Pres. Ali declares three days of mourning following capsizing of MV Barima
- ‘US$12.7M MV Ma Lisha still idle’ …embattled Edghill blames shifting soil, failed Port Kaituma wharf
Opposition nominated GECOM Commissioners do not represent party interests – Alexander
(Kaieteur News) – Appearing on Tuesday’s broadcast of Politics 101 with Dr. David Hinds, veteran GECOM opposition nominated Commissioner Vincent Alexander rejected claims that a change in the leadership of the parliamentary opposition grants an automatic right to recall and replace sitting commissioners. Interviewed by host, Dr. David Hinds MP, Alexander argued that the country’s supreme law intentionally insulates commissioners from political whims to preserve the integrity of the electoral process.
Opposition nominated GECOM commissioner Vincent Alexander
The debate hinges on a core interpretation of the constitutional amendments enacted during the 2000–2001 reform process. Prior to 2001, electoral commissions in Guyana were temporary bodies convened strictly for the duration of an election cycle and dissolved three months post-balloting. The modern framework, however, established GECOM as a permanent institution.
According to Alexander, a fundamental legal distinction exists between a political “representative” and a constitutional “nominee.” He explained that literary interpretation of a representative means you have a particular interest and you are not your own. Conversely, a nominee means that you are considered to be an appropriate person to fill the office, but you are not tied to anyone.
“Our legal system distinguishes between nominees and representatives,” Alexander stated during the broadcast. “Literary interpretation of a representative means you have a particular interest; you are not your own. A nominee means that you are considered to be an appropriate person to fill the office, but you are not tied to anyone.”
Alexander emphasised that there is absolutely no mechanism within the current law that allows a nominating political party or an opposition leader to unilaterally withdraw a commissioner. Under the constitution, commissioners can only be removed under strict, legally defined conditions, such as medical incapacity, resignation, or proven misconduct, none of which are tied to shifting political tides.
Despite defending the legal permanency of his current tenure, Alexander acknowledged to Dr. Hinds that the practical functioning of GECOM has frequently been marred by partisan gridlock. He criticised the current system’s vulnerability to “parochial party politics,” which often reduces independent constitutional actors to political arbiters. To break this cycle, Alexander is advocating for a sweeping structural overhaul of Guyana’s electoral management body, pointing toward regional frameworks as a viable path forward.
Alexander highlighted the Jamaican electoral model as a potential blueprint for reform to minimise political deadlock. He suggested a balanced composition utilising balanced partisan representation alongside an equal number of independent civil society experts. This framework relies on consensus-driven leadership, requiring mutual consent from both political and civil society members to elect a chairperson and a Chief Election Officer. By structuring the body so that political representatives lack the numbers to unilaterally dictate outcomes, the model establishes diminished partisan voting and forces a culture of unanimity.
Share this:
Discover more from Kaieteur News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Similar Articles
2 thoughts on “Opposition nominated GECOM Commissioners do not represent party interests – Alexander”
Blunt of the day
Sports
Features/Columnists
Sir. Ronald Sanders
The GHK Lall Column
Weekend Cartoon
Well, we have seen the ” 3 Amigos” vanish, no show, walked out, 2 showed
up- 1 no show, or 1 showed, 2 no show….is that not related to the APNU/AFC
strategies every time to stall ? No Quorum ?
Alexander makes no sense when he explains what we all knew of the
3 Amigos operandi’s records.
Deception!!!