𝐄𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐛𝐨 i𝐬 n𝐨𝐭 𝐚 𝐂𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐦𝐞: 𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐳𝐮𝐞𝐥𝐚’𝐬 𝐃𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐫𝐞 m𝐮𝐬𝐭 b𝐞 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝

May 04, 2026 Letters

Dear Editor,

Delcy Rodríguez’s latest pronouncements on the Essequibo controversy are not merely diplomatic posturing—they are calculated provocations dressed up as historical conviction.

To stand before an audience and declare Venezuela’s claim to Guyana’s sovereign territory is “irrefutable,” while quite literally wearing that claim on a brooch across regional platforms, is not an innocent expression of heritage.

𝗜𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗿𝗲—𝗱𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲, 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗱, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗮𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗳𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗲𝘁𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻.

𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝗺𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗲𝘅𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀.

The Essequibo is not Venezuela’s to reclaim, reinterpret, or rebrand through symbolism. It is Guyana’s—settled by the 1899 Arbitral Award, upheld in international law, and now properly before the International Court of Justice for final affirmation. There is nothing ambiguous about that legal reality, regardless of how many times Caracas attempts to blur it with appeals to “history.”

Rodríguez’s rhetorical flourish—questioning whether Venezuela’s history books should now be “burned”—is a distraction. History, in this case, is not being erased. It is being tested against law, evidence, and binding international processes.

And that is precisely where Venezuela’s claim continues to falter.

More troubling, however, is the strategic use of regional diplomacy as a stage for this narrative. By wearing a map that absorbs Essequibo into Venezuela during official visits to CARICOM states, Rodríguez is not simply making a personal statement—she is attempting to manufacture a sense of quiet acceptance.

President Irfaan Ali is therefore correct to sound the alarm.

CARICOM cannot afford to treat such acts as harmless symbolism. In geopolitics, symbols are signals—and Venezuela’s signals are unmistakable. They are designed to probe the region’s resolve, to test whether silence might be mistaken for consent, and to incrementally legitimise a claim that remains legally baseless.

Yván Gil’s dismissal of Guyana’s concerns as “drama” only reinforces this pattern of deflection. When challenged on substance, Caracas retreats into mockery and nationalist slogans. “Venezuela’s sun rises in the Essequibo,” he proclaims—an evocative phrase, but one that carries no weight in a court of law.

This is not a cultural disagreement. It is a territorial controversy with serious implications for sovereignty, regional stability, and international order.

And it is unfolding at a time when the geopolitical temperature of the Caribbean is already rising. With increased U.S. military presence in the region and explicit warnings against Venezuelan aggression, the margin for miscalculation is narrowing. Reckless rhetoric, even when cloaked in symbolism, carries consequences.

Rodríguez’s attempt to reassert Venezuela’s claim while simultaneously engaging the international community on more cooperative terms reveals a contradiction at the heart of Caracas’ current posture. One cannot speak the language of diplomacy while performing acts of quiet annexation—whether through maps, legislation, or symbolic display.

Guyana, for its part, must remain steady but unyielding. The strength of its position lies not in spectacle, but in law. The ICJ process is the appropriate arena for resolution, and every effort must be made to ensure that it is respected, untainted by political theatrics or regional ambiguity.

𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝗚𝘂𝘆𝗮𝗻𝗮 𝗰𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗮𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀.

CARICOM must move beyond statements of support and ensure that its platforms are not exploited—even inadvertently—to advance a member state’s territorial claim against another. Neutrality, in this context, risks being interpreted as tolerance.

The line must be clearly drawn.

Because if a brooch today is dismissed as a harmless expression, tomorrow it becomes a precedent. And in territorial disputes, precedent—no matter how small—can be dangerously consequential.

𝗘𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗶𝗯𝗼 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮 𝘀𝘆𝗺𝗯𝗼𝗹. 𝗜𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮 𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗲𝗱. 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗰𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮𝗻 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗻 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗮𝗽𝗲𝗹 𝗼𝗳 𝗴𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝗺𝗯𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻.

𝗜𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗚𝘂𝘆𝗮𝗻𝗮’𝘀 𝘀𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗶𝗴𝗻 𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆.

𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗻𝗼 𝗮𝗺𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁.

Sincerely,

Hemdutt Kumar

Discover more from Kaieteur News

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Letters

One thought on “𝐄𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐛𝐨 i𝐬 n𝐨𝐭 𝐚 𝐂𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐦𝐞: 𝐕𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐳𝐮𝐞𝐥𝐚’𝐬 𝐃𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐫𝐞 m𝐮𝐬𝐭 b𝐞 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝”

habeeb May 4, 2026 at 1:21 pm

A man who thinks he knows a woman, does not really know about women.
They are expressive in many ways, jewelery and all, minds finicky.

Comments are closed.

Latest News