Latest update April 18th, 2026 12:32 AM
Apr 18, 2026 Letters
Dear Editor,
Your editorial of Saturday April 11 on the Aurora Gold Mines (AGM) solar farm displays current evidence of my advocacy of solar power instead of the expensive Gas-to-Energy (GtE) project, which enriches foreign investors and contractors.
12 years ago, I set up a small home solar power system, which still supplies my needs. It cost US$5 per watt then with almost no maintenance, except that I changed my original lead-acid batteries, which lasted 4 years, for LiFePO4 batteries, which are still going strong. In 2021, when the GtE was said to cost US$900M, I advised friends and they installed solar power at US$2 per watt[i]. This same US$900M could have bought 5 kW solar power systems, each costing US$10,000 for 90,000 households across Guyana!
Each of such a system could power the usual household appliances. Current solar power systems are 8 kW for US$1.8 per watt with batteries and can power fridge, freezer, washing machine, microwave, water pump, ACs, deliver pure sine wave electricity to sensitive appliances like computing equipment, and even export to the GPL grid, as I see the GEA is trying to encourage.
The significance of the AGM solar farm is that it is buying 49.4 MW for US$100 million with battery power. This still translates to just over US$2 per watt with battery power and minimal maintenance. Compare this with the GtE for 300 MW, which will cost at least US$2.1 billion, and more likely, US$3 billion. This translates to US$7-10 per watt not even counting operation, maintenance and emissions. My hydropower estimate in 2021 of US$15 per watt was justified when the 150 kW Kato hydropower was reported to have cost the government US$2.3 million[ii], which is just over US$15 per watt.
| System | Installation cost in US$ | Power | Operation + Maintenance | Emissions | US$/watt |
| GtE | 2.1B – 3B | 300 MW | Plenty | Plenty | 7 to 10 |
| AGM solar | 100M | 49.4 MW | Minimal | None | 2 |
| Kato Hydro | 2.3 M | 150 kW | Small | None | 15 |
| Household solar | 14 k | 8 kW | Minimal | None | 1.8 |
We can all agree that AGM is here to profit as much as they can. They will not invest foolishly in powering their operations, or wait for the GtE to give energy; and now they won’t have to import fossil fuel in these times of shortage. Whereas, we have a Government that stubbornly and consistently loses money, and that plans to import and contribute to fossil fuel use in the long term.
Alfred Bhulai
Energy Technologist
[i] https://kaieteurnewsonline.com/2021/04/06/solar-energy-is-far-cheaper-than-the-us400-800m-gas-to-shore-project/
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Your children are starving, and you giving away their food to an already fat pussycat.
Apr 18, 2026
Kaieteur Sports – From an initial field of 32 schools, the 12th Annual Massy Distribution Schools Under-18 Football Tournament, organised by the Petra Organisation has been trimmed to the final...Apr 18, 2026
(Kaieteur News) – Years ago, I witnessed a scene that has remained with me ever since. A funeral cortège was making its way slowly along a public road, led by the hearse. Scores of vehicles driven by impatient motorists were overtaking the cortège, seemingly oblivious to the need to show...Apr 12, 2026
By Sir Ronald Sanders (Kaieteur News) – When the two-week ceasefire between the United States and Iran was announced on 7th April, 2026, the immediate reaction across much of the world was relief. By 8th April, that relief was reflected in a sharp fall in oil prices after weeks in which conflict...Apr 18, 2026
Hard Truths by GHK Lall (Kaieteur News) – The Commission of Inquiry chaired by Sir Adrian Fulford and probing for answers into the Southport, England tragedy went live with early conclusions on Monday, April 13 Three young girls, all under the age of 10, were knifed to death, six other...Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: glennlall2000@gmail.com / kaieteurnews@yahoo.com