Latest update July 28th, 2026 10:33 AM
Jan 04, 2026 Letters
Dear Editor,
The oil in Guyana belongs to the people of Guyana. It does not belong to the United States, to ExxonMobil, or to any group of elected officials acting beyond their constitutional trust.
On December 17, 2019, then U.S. President Donald Trump claimed that Venezuela had taken what he described as “our oil,” stating:
“They took all of our energy rights. They took all of our oil not that long ago. And we want it back.”
Before this, he linked this claim to allegations of drug trafficking and criminal activity as justification for escalated U.S. action against Venezuela. This is classical smokescreen PR, tell them one thing, but do it for another reason.
And the Government of Guyana repeated these exact reasons as recent as President Ali on January 3, 2026. It is like they are reading the same playbook or being coached on what to say.
That framing is legally false. Under international law, natural resources belong to the sovereign state and its people. No foreign power acquires ownership through sanctions, corporate contracts, or political alignment.
Guyana should take note. When Guyana aligns itself uncritically with U.S. geopolitical positions in Latin America, particularly against regional neighbours, it exposes itself to the same logic. If Venezuelan oil can be called “U.S. oil,” then Guyana’s is already US oil. Guyana’s decision to grant extraordinary control over its petroleum sector to ExxonMobil, a corporation deeply intertwined with U.S. strategic and economic interests, compounds this risk. Effective control has been transferred in ways that weaken Guyana’s bargaining power and regional independence.
Guyana occupies a uniquely vulnerable position as the only English-speaking country in South America. That position requires restraint, regional balance, and respect for Caribbean and Latin American solidarity, not alignment that places Guyana at the front line of external power struggles.
Guyana’s oil belongs to the people of Guyana. The State holds it in trust. No foreign government, corporation, or temporary administration has the authority to redefine that fact.
History shows that when sovereignty over resources is diluted in language, it is soon challenged in practice.
A. Ositin
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Jul 28, 2026
Cricinfo – The first ever Test at Tarouba made giant strides on the third day, claiming 14 wickets and hurtling towards its denouement. And yet, it appeared to stand in almost exactly the same...Jul 28, 2026
(Kaieteur News) – Parliament has never been a silent chamber. Around the world, legislatures have always been places where members interrupt, heckle, applaud loudly, exchange sharp remarks and use wit to make political points. These moments are part of parliamentary democracy. They reflect...Jul 19, 2026
By Sir Ronald Sanders (Kaieteur News) – Few issues test the sovereignty of small states more severely than requests made by powerful friends. How should a country respond when cooperation is expected, but the proposed terms exceed its legal, financial and institutional capacity? That question...Jul 27, 2026
(Kaieteur News) – There’s human devastation. Still, the PPP Govt commits to deflection. The MV Barima disaster qualifies as extreme domestic devastation. Families and communities battered. The nation bowed. Rather than strengthening citizens in a time of tribulation, the government...Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: glennlall2000@gmail.com / kaieteurnews@yahoo.com