Why the President must dissolve parliament before holding elections

Jul 05, 2025 Features / Columnists, Peeping Tom

---

Kaieteur News – In any parliamentary democracy, the dissolution of parliament is a constitutional and democratic necessity. In Guyana, the Constitution mandates that general and regional elections be held after Parliament has been dissolved and within a fixed period of time—three months—thereafter. But why is this so? And what does it say about the nature of parliamentary governance and electoral legitimacy?

At its core, the dissolution of Parliament brings the current legislative session to an end. In Guyana, this is done by way of a presidential proclamation issued under Article 70(2) of the Constitution. Once Parliament is dissolved, all sitting Members of Parliament (MPs) effectively lose their seats. The country is no longer represented by a functioning legislative body. What follows is a period of political transition leading to fresh elections and the formation of a new Parliament.

This process reflects a core principle of parliamentary democracy: that power ultimately resides with the people. Elected representatives serve for a fixed term—five years in Guyana’s case, unless Parliament is dissolved earlier. After that term expires, the people must be given a chance to renew or revoke their mandate.

Parliament has to be dissolved so as to make parliamentary seats open for persons to be elected to these seats. In Guyana’s system, elections are not partial (except in cases of by-elections) but general. This means every seat in the National Assembly becomes vacant, and persons must have the chance to elect or re-elect their representative. For this to happen, the current Parliament must be dissolved—effectively vacating all seats and triggering the electoral machinery.

The President’s constitutional duty to dissolve Parliament and hold elections within three months is a vital guardrail of democracy in Guyana. It ensures that leadership remains answerable to the people, that Parliament is regularly refreshed with new or renewed mandates, and that no government can govern indefinitely without consent.

Once Parliament is dissolved, Article 61 of the Constitution kicks in. This provision requires that general elections be held within three months of the dissolution unless an extension is granted by two-thirds of all elected members of the National Assembly.

Why the tight timeframe? This safeguard exists to prevent executive overreach. Without a functioning Parliament, the country lacks a key pillar of democratic oversight. In the absence of the legislature, the executive—i.e., the President and Cabinet—exercises power without the normal checks and balances. A prolonged period without Parliament could invite authoritarian tendencies or executive drift.

The three-month limit ensures that the vacuum of representation is not left open indefinitely. It protects the people’s right to timely representation and prevents the government of the day from dragging its feet or postponing elections for political advantage.

The three-month limit imposed by the Constitution ensures that no government can dissolve Parliament and then continue to govern without promptly returning to the electorate for a renewed mandate. It is a critical safeguard against executive overreach, designed to prevent any administration from abusing the dissolution process as a tactic to sideline parliamentary scrutiny while clinging to power.

Without this constitutional time frame, a government could theoretically dissolve Parliament and delay elections indefinitely, effectively ruling without legislative oversight or democratic legitimacy. The three-month window thus upholds the fundamental democratic principle that a government must remain accountable to the people and cannot operate above or beyond the electoral process.

The dissolution of Parliament is formalized through a proclamation by the President. This is not just a press release or announcement—it is a constitutional act that signals the start of the electoral cycle. It is typically accompanied by another or the same proclamation naming the date for elections.

In some instances, a proclamation of dissolution may be issued prematurely, i.e., before the five-year term ends. This usually happens when the government believes it no longer enjoys the confidence of the House, or when it wishes to seek a new mandate on the strength of its record or proposed future agenda. The President may also be forced to dissolve Parliament early in the event of a successful no-confidence vote under Article 106(6).

The process of dissolution and the subsequent holding of elections is not a technicality. It is how power is transferred or renewed, how the will of the people is tested, and how governments remain accountable.

Importantly, it prevents any branch of government from monopolizing power. Once Parliament is dissolved, the executive becomes a caretaker government. It can manage day-to-day affairs but must not undertake major policy decisions or commit the country to significant new obligations. Its job is to ensure a free and fair election and to respect the outcome.

(The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of this newspaper.)

---

• Constitution, Guyana Elections 2025, Parliament, Peeping Tom

---