Latest update July 20th, 2026 9:53 PM
Feb 07, 2021 Letters
DEAR EDITOR,
Regarding your news report (Feb. 5) and commentaries (Feb 6) on trade agreement with Taiwan, on Thursday morning I received phone calls from friends on my views of Wednesday’s announcement of an agreement for the establishment of a Taiwan trade office in Guyana. Having done a doctorate in International Relations and specifically studied and taught courses on the China-Taiwan dispute, I was taken aback by the Guyana government’s announcement of a Taiwan trade office, given Guyana’s official ‘one China policy’ and deep trade links with the mainland. Nevertheless, I welcomed the establishment of such an office to bolster trade with Taiwan, which can provide funding for the transformation of Guyana and also purchase our products.
Anyone who studies foreign policy would be able to figure out what led to such a trade agreement between Guyana and Taiwan. I saw no harm in relations with China in trading with Taiwan or encouraging Taiwanese to invest in Guyana. I saw the Guyana government announcement in the context of Guyana deepening its relations with the US and Western democracies and our country’s own geo-strategic interests – America is the guarantor of democracy in Guyana. It installs and removes governments.
Last Wednesday, the international wire, Yahoo News, carried reports that President Biden would visit the State Department on Thursday for a major policy announcement on China and the dispute with Taiwan. China was rattling the swords on closer Taiwan-US relations and threatened invasion were Taiwan to declare independence. The US would not sit by idly and allow Taiwan, a long-term ally, to be bullied or invaded. The US flexed its muscles immediately. President Biden redirected two US aircraft carriers in the Taiwan Straits. Some African and Middle Eastern countries also announced linkages or trade relations with Taiwan in recent weeks – would not have come about without some US nodding. The US “is upping” the pressure on China, which recently began pursuing an activist foreign policy and naval presence in waterways dominated by the US. The US President does not routinely visit the State Department; his visit would have important implication. It was a major China policy announcement by the US Administration. Biden would continue the Trump policy of cementing the alliance with India, Australia and Japan to contain China’s rising ambition in the greater Pacific and Indian Ocean areas.
On Thursday evening, the government cancelled (reversed) the planned agreement of the Taiwan trade office, calling it “a mistake.” The phone calls came in again for my view on the policy reversal. Having made the agreement, there was no need to reverse course. Taiwan is a developed nation. It is the largest investor in China – has been so over the last twenty years with tens of billions in American dollars invested annually all over China. If Taiwan can invest in China without any problems, there is no harm done in Guyana trading with Taiwan. At any rate, since China considers Taiwan as part of its territory, a renegade province, should the Taiwan treaty not been seen as a trade agreement with China? Trade with Taiwan should not lessen relations with China. I should note that Taiwan lost its status as a sovereign entity in 1971 when the US and UN recognized China as the representative of all of China. Since the 1990s, Taiwan has not challenged the legitimacy of China as the representative of all of China although it still sees itself as a separate state from the mainland.
It is critical for Guyana to choose allies wisely. A country must have permanent interests’ not necessarily permanent allies. If there is one thing I learnt in my studies on foreign policy and strategic interests, Guyana must not get on the wrong side of the US. We remember all too well what happened in 1953, 1964, 2015, and 2020. Governments paid dearly for crossing with the US. Also, there are more Guyanese and their children living in America than in Guyana; they value close relations with America. Cementing ties with the US and opening trade links with Taiwan would not compromise our recognition of China as the representative of all of China or our “one China” policy.
Yours truly,
Dr. Vishnu Bisram
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Jul 20, 2026
(BBC Sport) – Spain deservedly won a desperately disappointing World Cup final as Ferran Torres’ extra-time strike finally broke the resistance of 10-man Argentina. The European title...Jul 20, 2026
(Kaieteur News) – Christopher Ram begins his latest letter by declaring: “For a columnist who does not usually respond, Peeping Tom has spent the past several days doing little else.” That opening sentence collapses almost immediately under the weight of its own inaccuracy. What I...Jul 19, 2026
By Sir Ronald Sanders (Kaieteur News) – Few issues test the sovereignty of small states more severely than requests made by powerful friends. How should a country respond when cooperation is expected, but the proposed terms exceed its legal, financial and institutional capacity? That question...Jul 20, 2026
(Kaieteur News) – Everything comes to a pause. Writings already sent suspended. There is only one development to share a word about: the MV Barima. One word, and a whole barrel of pain. A disaster greeting long before the sun showed its face on a Sunday. Of all days, a Sunday. The...Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: glennlall2000@gmail.com / kaieteurnews@yahoo.com