Latest update November 11th, 2026 10:25 AM
Latest News
- Pres. Ali refuses resignation of COI chairman despite U.S. revoked his visa
- Australian firm taps $4B Govt. mineral mapping programme for Oko gold hunt
- Marine Superintendent admits MV Barima had flaws
- Caribbean records 13,000 new HIV infections, 4,800 AIDS deaths in 2025
- GECOM Chair defends meeting diplomats
Do More?
Dear Editor,
GT&T’s pronounced motto is: DO MORE.
An aspiration that is substantively honoured in the breach. For certainly, it delivers less in recent months in terms of billing.
The latest version defies customers’ expectations of being able to verify that individual charges are indeed correct.
GT&T does even more – the name of the ‘customer’ is deleted from the bill, and he/she becomes an automated (if not robotic) account number – without reference to the variations of charges.
The message is that the customer is as nameless as GT&T’s customer service is impersonal and unidentifiable.
It becomes an irony that the ‘Communications’ section of a ‘Telecommunications’ service barely provides for human connection, even though the recording pretends that ‘you’ are an ‘important’ customer, but ‘you’ will have to wait for a response – for an indefinite period.
No provision so made for the fact that a significant percentage of customers (particularly senior citizens) who have to stand in interminable lines, because they are not ‘online’, without accommodation for the physically indisposed.
Why does one harbour the impression that there exists an official commitment to address and correct this environment of a monopoly?
Why do the ‘customers’, whose payments of undisclosed charges sustain this very organisation, have to suffer its arrogance?
Why is it being ignored that, in addition to being customers, we are also citizens who have legal (constitutional) rights?
It could not be that corporate entities, and public sector agencies, are also treated as numbered accounts?
One wonders whether there is an explicit degree of accountability by GT&T to the Public Utilities Commission, and for that matter, what progress is being made by the PUC in deconstructing the monopoly framework?
Interestingly enough, there is a Ministry of Public Telecommunications, when in fact the service providers are private agencies; with Government understood to having miniscule shareholding in GT&T. That does not say that the former should not be eligible to be part of the policy-making of an entity which is yet to be transitioned.
On behalf of customers and citizens who deserve to be appropriately respected,
Please ‘Do More’
E.B. John
Share this:
Discover more from Kaieteur News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Similar Articles
Website Hits
Blunt of the day
Sports
Features/Columnists
Sir. Ronald Sanders
The GHK Lall Column
Weekend Cartoon
