Can the President say he really did a good job?

Nov 09, 2019 Letters

Dear Editor,

The Department of Public Information (DPI), in an excerpt from President David Granger’s interview of November 01 with Kaieteur Radio, quotes the President to say “My legacy is written on the faces of the people of this country and I’m very happy that I have been accepted as their President. I go to communities and they realise we have been doing a good job”.
While the President is obviously entitled to his opinion, it is hard not to wonder whether his feet were firmly on the ground when he spoke.
While the President’s contribution, and ultimate legacy, can be assessed from several points-of-view, how can he, with all seriousness and a straight face, pat himself and administration on the back for a job apparently well-done?
Just consider the President’s and his Government’s concern for the nation’s sugar workers.
In the era of the Granger administration, the President and his cohorts have chosen, without hesitation or even a seeming second glance, to put some 7,000 sugar workers on the breadline. It has been described as the single largest retrenchment in our post-independent history.

How can the President be “…very happy…” when thousands of Guyanese, his fellow countrymen and women, right, at this very time, have a hard, if not difficult, time to live a normal life.
Just consider 13-year old Devina Budwah of Wales who is quoted as saying “I really want to go back to school, but sugar plantation close down…when I was in school, I always wanted to become a nurse, the estate is closed now, so my dream is fall apart”.
Think about how many Devinas are there now and how their dreams to become nurses, doctors, lawyers, other professionals, some even aspiring to be President, have now fallen apart.
How can he “…as their President” say his Government has “…been doing a good job” when Guyanese like Avinash Singh, who according to a September 30, 2018 article, doesn’t “…want to wake up in the night and your kids tell you that they are hungry and you don’t have anything to give them”.
They are fathers and mothers, right now, in the same situation as Avinash.
How many are like Bindmattie Hardatt Mala who, according to a September 29, 2018 report is forced to eat one meal per day.
This is the real situation for many. Then there are a few like Stephanie Adams who takes “…a blind to part off the house…”.
She said that“…we na get money to do nothing, we na get water and light”.
These are the real cries of Guyanese who have been placed in a miserable life by the Granger administration. These are people who have given their life and efforts to Guyana and for their contribution they are forgotten, cast aside and simply ignored.
As Granger blows his trumpet, the late Andaiye with Eusi Kwayana and Moses Bhagwan in the on January 08, 2018 summed it up appropriately when they deemed the Government’s sugar policy as “…disastrous… callous, foolish, ill-advised and economically unfeasible”.
Mr Christopher Ram, in a December 19, 2018 report, said the Government’s actions were “…callous and… cruel”.
Today, the President, who has chosen to surround himself with a battalion of security personnel, erects barricades around him and employs a host of extra-ordinary security measures, really should not try to rewrite or misrepresent the facts and ignore the reality.
There is hardly been anything close to a “…good job” by the Granger administration as it regards sugar as in many other areas of national life.
Seepaul Narine
General Secretary
GAWU

Discover more from Kaieteur News

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Latest News