Is there some trickery going on at GuySuco?

Nov 23, 2016 Letters

Dear Editor,
I refer to the article “Appalling state of Skeldon, failing industry….Jagdeo, Ramotar trying to confuse the nation with trickery” in November 17th edition of KN in which GuySuCo’s Chairman named the company that conducted the audit at Skeldon. Editor, I feel compelled to make a few points so that the Guyanese public can decide where the trickery is coming from:
(1) Wartsila is well known globally for its expertise in power generation mainly with engines. This company is not known for expertise in sugar mill designs and sugar production. From the photographs and descriptions provided, Wartsila’s audit focused on power generation at Skeldon. It therefore boggles the mind how the Chairman concluded that the whole factory is falling apart using findings of an audit from a power company as a basis. GuySuCo is deliberately withholding a fact that Wartsila currently manages the operations of engines at Skeldon therefore, the only plausible conclusion is that Wartsila may have an interest in the steam power plant (boilers and turbines) but they may not want to pay the real price hence an audit to argue for reduced value for assets. It’s a case where a person intends to buy a car and an inept seller depends on the buyer to assess that car for a value. Is there some trickery here?
(2) I spoke about the need for a robust maintenance programme in my previous letter and I maintain that if proper maintenance is not done, any machinery will deteriorate and do so quickly. Can the Chairman provide this nation with the maintenance programmes for Skeldon for the periods May- August 2015, December, 2015- February, 2016 and May-August, 2016? This will explain whether or not Skeldon was under-maintained during the three maintenance periods under his watch. The photographs provided are for cooling water pumps. This looks like the raw water (canal water) pump station which will be in poor condition if pump glands leak. The photos show this. Is there some trickery here?
(3In the article, Mr. Vieira was quoted as saying “When we took over Skeldon, it was only producing 20,000t of sugar”. This is just a plain lie. At the end of 1st crop 2015, Skeldon produced 8,220t sugar and was poised for a good 2nd crop with canes in ground which Mr. Vieira and the Chairman inherited. At end of 2015, Skeldon made 39,158t sugar and the Chairman boasted about it. This is 19,158t more than what Mr. Vieira stated. Is there some trickery here?
(4) 2016 is coming to a close and GuySuCo’s production is just about 150,000t sugar. The company is on track to hit the lowest production since 1990. The Chairman and team maybe searching for reasons to explain this abysmal management performance and Skeldon seem to be an ideal scapegoat. Is there some trickery here?
Frederick Yuvraj

Discover more from Kaieteur News

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Latest News