Latest update August 10th, 2026 12:59 AM
Aug 09, 2026 Features / Columnists, News
(Kaieteur News) – Relationships require emotional safety, openness, trust and the ability to tolerate vulnerability. Yet some individuals deeply desire love while simultaneously fearing it. They pursue a partner when distance develops, but withdraw as soon as intimacy returns. The anxious-avoidant person lives with two powerful and conflicting needs: “Please come close—I need to know that you love me.” “Do not come too close—you may control, reject, shame or abandon me.” This painful approach-and-retreat cycle is often described as an anxious-avoidant or fearful-avoidant relationship pattern.
Avoidant Personality Disorder (AvPD) is a mental-health condition, while anxious, avoidant and fearful-avoidant attachment describe patterns of relating. AvPD involves a persistent pattern of social inhibition, feelings of inadequacy and extreme sensitivity to criticism or rejection across several areas of life—not only romantic relationships.
Consequently, intimacy activates rather than calms the nervous system. Love feels desirable from a distance but threatening when it becomes real. The individual interprets ordinary relationship difficulties—delayed messages, disagreements, requests for commitment or changes in tone—as signs of rejection, criticism or impending abandonment. This is not necessarily intentional manipulation. It is frequently an unconscious defence developed to prevent the repetition of childhood emotional pain.
Intimate relationships activate our deepest need for love—and our deepest fear of being hurt. A person desperately wants closeness but become frightened when a partner gets emotionally nearby. They pursue reassurance one day and withdraw the next, creating a painful cycle of connection, anxiety, rejection and emotional distance. This pattern is commonly described as anxious-avoidant or fearful-avoidant attachment.
At the center of anxious-avoidant relating is an internal contradiction: “I need you to love me, but I am afraid that loving you gives you the power to reject, control or abandon me.”
This is not necessarily deliberate manipulation. It is frequently an unconscious protective strategy. The person’s nervous system has learned that relationships are both necessary and unsafe. Avoidance temporarily reduces anxiety, but it also prevents corrective experiences of trust, acceptance and healthy dependency.
Fear of rejection, criticism, abandonment or humiliation. Negative beliefs such as “I am not good enough. Difficulty trusting a partner’s love. Emotional suppression and discomfort with vulnerability. Excessive analysis of messages, tone of voice and facial expressions. Wanting intimacy but feeling trapped by it. Withdrawing during conflict. Testing a partner’s loyalty. Assuming that rejection will eventually occur. Ending relationships before the partner can leave.
Avoidance becomes self-sabotage when protective behaviours repeatedly create the very rejection the person fears.
Anxious-avoidant patterns or avoidant personality disorder usually develop through an interaction among temperament, early relationships, adverse experiences and later social learning. Poor, inconsistent parenting. Difficult parent-child relationship. Unsafe community
Emotional neglect or inconsistent caregiving. Harsh, controlling or highly critical parenting. Childhood abuse, abandonment or repeated separation. Bullying, colourism, poverty-related humiliation or social rejection. Parents who discouraged emotional expression. Growing up around domestic conflict, addiction or mental illness. Betrayal, infidelity or abuse in later relationships. Religious or cultural teachings that associate vulnerability with weakness.
A child concludes: “If people truly know me, they will reject me.” In adulthood, this belief can remain active even when the present partner is emotionally safe.
At the beginning of a relationship, the person may feel safer because emotional investment remains limited. Once the relationship becomes serious, fears intensify. Greater love now creates greater potential loss.
The person may become highly attentive to signs of disinterest. A delayed message, tired expression or request for personal space may be interpreted as rejection. The anxious response may involve repeated calling, jealousy, accusations or demands for reassurance. When the partner responds, the avoidant defence may suddenly emerge: emotional shutdown, coldness, criticism or disappearance.
Choosing emotionally unavailable partners. Keeping secrets to avoid feeling exposed. Rejecting compliments or questioning a partner’s motives. Creating arguments before important moments of intimacy. Comparing the present partner with previous partners. Using work, church, social media or other responsibilities to avoid connection. Withholding affection after feeling hurt. Refusing to discuss emotions. Becoming uncomfortable after sex or emotional disclosure. Remaining in an unhealthy relationship because loneliness feels worse than mistreatment.
This creates a pursue-withdraw cycle. One partner demands connection; the other retreats. The withdrawal increases anxiety, and the increased pursuit produces further withdrawal. Over time, both partners feel misunderstood and emotionally exhausted.
Women have more attachment anxiety and men more attachment avoidance. These gender patterns are influenced by age, culture and social expectations. Women are socialised to value relationships, emotional awareness and relational responsibility. Consequently, insecurity may appear as reassurance-seeking, self-blame, jealousy, over functioning, difficulty establishing boundaries or remaining with an emotionally unavailable partner. Some women suppress their needs until resentment erupts, fearing that direct requests will cause abandonment.
Men are taught that vulnerability, dependency and fear are signs of weakness. Insecurity may therefore appear as emotional detachment, irritability, excessive independence, sexual distancing, workaholism, refusal to seek help or disappearance during conflict. Anger conceals shame, fear or longing.
In Caribbean and Guyanese settings, gender expectations strengthen these defences. Men receive praise for emotional hardness, while women are expected to preserve relationships at personal cost. Healthy recovery requires both men and women to develop emotional language, mutual responsibility and secure boundaries.
The pattern can change. Healing requires responding to fear differently. Your self-esteem needs to be rebuilt. And self-confidence and self-worth will be boosted from a health self-esteem.
First, identify the cycle. Record what happened, what you assumed, what you felt, what your body experienced and how you reacted. Separate facts from fear-based interpretations.
Second, regulate before communicating. Slow breathing, grounding, prayer, walking and temporarily pausing a heated conversation can settle the nervous system. A pause should include a commitment to return: “I need twenty minutes to regulate, but I will come back so we can resolve this.”
Third, replace indirect testing with direct requests. Instead of withdrawing to see whether the partner follows, say, “I am feeling insecure and need reassurance.” Direct communication makes intimacy safer and more predictable.
Fourth, practise gradual vulnerability. Share manageable feelings rather than disclosing everything at once or remaining completely guarded. Notice whether the partner responds with care, consistency and respect.
Fifth, challenge core beliefs. Replace “Everyone eventually abandons me” with a balanced statement: “Some people have hurt me, but I can evaluate this relationship based on present evidence.”
Sixth, establish healthy boundaries. Healing does not mean tolerating abuse, betrayal or manipulation. Secure attachment combines closeness with individuality, accountability and safety.
Finally, seek professional help, psychotherapy when the pattern is persistent or significantly impairing. This is a childhood formation and would need clinical work to change this disorder. Psychodynamic therapy explores unconscious conflicts and early relational wounds. Cognitive behavioural therapy can challenge shame-based thinking and avoidance, while schema or attachment-focused approaches can help restructure deeply rooted beliefs. Couples therapy interrupt the pursue-withdraw cycle. Psychotherapy is the central treatment for Avoidant Personality Disorder, although medication may sometimes address accompanying anxiety or depression.
Relationship sabotage is often a survival strategy that has outlived its original purpose. The person is not incapable of love; you have learned to protect yourself from it. Through insight, emotional regulation, honest communication, consistent relationships and professional treatment, fear gradually give way to trust—and intimacy becomes a place of safety rather than danger.
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Rising Debt, Rising US Dollar Rate in Oil-rich Guyana!

Aug 10, 2026
(Kaieteur Sport) An electrifying night of high-impact action, drama and championship changes marked All Caribbean Wrestling’s (ACW) historic debut in Guyana, as the promotion brought its...Aug 10, 2026
(Kaieteur News) There was a time, not so long ago, when pumpkin was pumpkin. You went to the market, found a vendor, pointed to a whole pumpkin, paid your money and took it home. Nobody asked you how many pounds you wanted. Nobody weighed it. Nobody carefully cut it into sections as though dividing...Aug 02, 2026
By Sir Ronald Sanders (Kaieteur News) – Daniel Ortega has now said openly what his regime has demonstrated for years: the people of Nicaragua are not to be permitted to remove their rulers through elections. During celebrations marking the 47th anniversary of the Sandinista Revolution, Ortega...Aug 10, 2026
(Kaieteur News) On 31st July, some of the words uttered by Exxon’s Chief, Mr. Darren Woods, were as clear as a bugle. Exxon has recovered all of its investment in Guyana -all US$55B. I thank Mr. Woods for his clarity on that score and his extra note about the repayment being two years ahead...Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: glennlall2000@gmail.com / kaieteurnews@yahoo.com