What I find most interesting in the recent public discourse in Guyana is that some have not paid attention to or frankly may have chosen not to notice the irony that should not be overlooked.
Those who most forcefully accuse others of corruption without first presenting verifiable facts and evidence should themselves recognize that the principles of accountability and due process apply equally to every public official and political leader, irrespective of office or party affiliation.
A democracy cannot credibly demand one evidentiary standard for political opponents while embracing a different and lower standard for oneself. Where a public figure has been the subject of official sanctions, investigations, or legal actions by competent authorities, whether domestic or international, those matters, like all others, should be assessed on the basis of official records, admissible evidence, and the rule of law, rather than selective political narratives. Consistency is indispensable to the credibility of democratic leadership. One cannot insist that allegations alone should condemn a political adversary while simultaneously arguing that due process and evidentiary standards should apply in one’s own circumstances.
The rule of law is not a partisan instrument; it is a constitutional principle that must be applied uniformly. That is precisely why every allegation, against every individual, must ultimately stand or fall on the strength of the facts and evidence presented before the appropriate legal institutions, and not on the volume of political rhetoric or the passions of the moment.
The burden of proof is on the accuser, whoever makes a claim must provide sufficient evidence to support it.The defending party is presumed innocent or in the right until that burden is met
…Guyana to face Bermuda in final match tonight By Rawle Toney Kaieteur Sports – Guyana kept its FIBA AmeriCup Caribbean Pre-Qualifiers campaign on course with an impressive 68-53 victory over...
(Kaieteur News) – Christopher Ram’s latest letter (Kiskadee Watch, July 9th 2026) culminates with what is intended to be its most dramatic flourish: a demand that President Irfaan Ali establish a Commission of Inquiry (COI) to investigate every aspect of his agricultural enterprise. It is...
By Sir Ronald Sanders (Kaieteur News) – Two hundred and fifty years ago, in the sweltering heat of a Philadelphia summer, a small group of men did something without precedent in modern history. They gathered, argued, deliberated, and then signed their names to a declaration that was a...
Hard Truths by GHK Lall (Kaieteur News) – Almost without exception, Guyanese across the board, are familiar about the kind of upstanding citizen and leader that Pres. Ali is. They have a good idea about the quality of his character, the beauties of his activities. Their leader is a winner. ...
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: glennlall2000@gmail.com / kaieteurnews@yahoo.com
The burden of proof is on the accuser
Jul 11, 2026 Front Page Comment, Letters
Dear Editor,
What I find most interesting in the recent public discourse in Guyana is that some have not paid attention to or frankly may have chosen not to notice the irony that should not be overlooked.
Those who most forcefully accuse others of corruption without first presenting verifiable facts and evidence should themselves recognize that the principles of accountability and due process apply equally to every public official and political leader, irrespective of office or party affiliation.
A democracy cannot credibly demand one evidentiary standard for political opponents while embracing a different and lower standard for oneself. Where a public figure has been the subject of official sanctions, investigations, or legal actions by competent authorities, whether domestic or international, those matters, like all others, should be assessed on the basis of official records, admissible evidence, and the rule of law, rather than selective political narratives. Consistency is indispensable to the credibility of democratic leadership. One cannot insist that allegations alone should condemn a political adversary while simultaneously arguing that due process and evidentiary standards should apply in one’s own circumstances.
The rule of law is not a partisan instrument; it is a constitutional principle that must be applied uniformly. That is precisely why every allegation, against every individual, must ultimately stand or fall on the strength of the facts and evidence presented before the appropriate legal institutions, and not on the volume of political rhetoric or the passions of the moment.
The burden of proof is on the accuser, whoever makes a claim must provide sufficient evidence to support it.The defending party is presumed innocent or in the right until that burden is met
Yours respectfully,
Jermaine Figueira
Former Member of Parliament
Share this:
Discover more from Kaieteur News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Similar Articles