Latest update August 27th, 2026 10:20 AM
Jun 23, 2026 Features / Columnists, The GHK Lall Column
(Kaieteur News) – The PPP Govt-initiated $40B Guyana Development Bank (Bank) can be great. Ordinary Guyanese-poor, harbouring inspired ideas, but lacking capital-have opportunity beckoning. Opportunity to rise from where they are to what they envision could be, should be. Again, compliments to the PPP Govt for this brainchild. What has high much potential for individual, family, community, prosperity. Let it never be said that I didn’t extol the government.
Much has been written about the bank. Its innate goodness, noble charter, inspiring character. Gnawing concerns persist. Still, no tainting to this offering by dealing in who defends for a dollar. Or the rancidly partisan who behold the worst. I see potential for the worst malfeasances in this bank. I detect that it can be a lifeline to Guyanese who need the monetary boost. Above bottom-house, beyond street corners, out of the economic lowlands so prone to floods of woes that there’s weeping. Only weeping.
I stated my thinking, position. Another is presented. Three precedents offered. Should suffice. There is a Natural Resource Fund Act/Law. I point not to loopholes. I point to its demand for “transparency and accountability.” Who argues with laws with such clauses embedded? Plus, withdrawals used for “national development priorities.” Music. Easy listening. Guyanese listened, heard. From a Guyana government official, that rarest of rarities: Guyana Scholar. He disclosed how the billions (U.S.) withdrawn from the NRF were spent in three words: “national development priorities.” Three words (“transparency and accountability”), as enshrined in the NRF Law, begat three more: “national development priorities”, also incorporated in that same law. No more. Not a fourth word. If this is what Guyanese get for spending clarity from a Guyana scholar, what prospects from Guyana’s handpicked political dunces? Not one dollar, not one million, not one billion, could be shared, relative to spending specifics. Commingling conquering accountability. The words of a law of Guyana taken and hurled into the face of citizens, by one of its reputed best. It’s the raw reality of Guyana’s “accountability” for its largest savings account, pursuant to law. What fate awaits the Guyana Development Bank?
Next, there’s a law birthed 14 years ago that empowers Guyanese to access unclassified, nonconfidential, non-national security information. The law rusts, rots. Guyanese seeking access have been mostly dismissed. Light slap. Other petitioners got dismissed, then degraded. The law is there. The mechanism is there. Where is the access to information sought, as the law provides? From that second precedent, I move to the $40 billion Guyana Development Bank. Would obscurity to protect be among the primary workings of this multibillion-dollar bank? Protect who and for what? Ignored today are favouritism, cronyism, and nepotism. May those never dawn. Only the bank’s honest duty, transparency, and accountability. What road ahead for this bank that could be a flagship of incorruptibility? The identification of its controllers (likely already selected) should inform accordingly.
Last, there is the crime of statutory rape. When underage children are abused, that’s statutory rape. Official reports state that 584 statutory rapes were committed in the last five years (2020-25). The law mandates the charge of statutory rape. Children cannot consent. Which rapists were charged? How many of the 584 statutory rapists were even approached by the Guyana police, other government institutions? Dr. Vindya Persaud (Minister) and Dr. Clifton Hicken (Police Commissioner) are respectfully invited to help: how many charged? Only the number. Easy for a government grown fond of its own statistics.
For the PPP Govt, for PPP leaders, there are some questions. Why are lawbreakers (statutory rapists) elevated to parliament as lawmakers? Why are they not charged? There’s One Guyana optics. And a large constituency to be kept happy. But, by God, at the price of parliamentary obscenity? Even when children are assaulted, and one ending it all. It calls for an extraordinarily obscene breed of political leaders to condone first, then reward.
Thus, three examples: Oil Fund billions, access to information, and statutory rapes, as contexts. There are governing laws for each, like the Bank. How different will the Guyana Development Bank be? The people’s patrimony and prosperity, their peace of mind, jeopardised. The lifeblood of democracy (information) blocked, poisoned, then extinguished. Protection of Guyana’s young bartered for filthy political mileage. Laws exist for all three areas. Yet there are these inarguable, destructive conditions in Guyana’s environment. Now comes this $40 billion Guyana Development Bank. It can be a boon for the poor and hopeful. Maybe a bonanza for the schemers, defrauders, that makeup over 90% of PPP governance, PPP stewardship, PPP morality and integrity. Soon, Guyanese shall see.
(The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of this newspaper)
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Aug 27, 2026
…Championship set for March 3 – 5 By Rawle Toney Kaieteur Sports – The National Schools Athletics Championships will return to Linden for the first time in nearly two decades, with the 2027...Aug 27, 2026
(Kaieteur News) – There is a particular species of political nostalgia that thrives in countries with short memories. It takes yesterday’s failures, dusts them with the language of national purpose, places them beneath a portrait of the departed leader and calls the result a vision. This is...Aug 23, 2026
By Sir Ronald Sanders (Kaieteur News) – I have been an advocate of the Caribbean Court of Justice from its conception. In 2015, on the Court’s tenth anniversary, I described its creation as arguably the most significant institutional achievement of the English-speaking Caribbean since the...Aug 27, 2026
Hard Truths by GHK Lall (Kaieteur News) – Pres. Ali means well. I wonder, though, whether he is serious. Or, if he takes himself seriously. I put it gently. He should listen to himself. The parts of his speeches that are not AI influenced. (Follow-up planned). Change eating...Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: glennlall2000@gmail.com / kaieteurnews@yahoo.com