Latest update September 24th, 2026 10:31 AM
Healthcare and charity crisis
(Kaieteur News) – The death of a child while awaiting life-saving care is not merely a private tragedy, it is a damning indictment of a system that has failed at its most basic duty.
When 12-year-old Marlon Jupiter died before the full $7 million needed for his bone marrow transplant could be raised, this country was confronted with an uncomfortable truth: in an oil-rich nation, a child’s survival still depends on a public collection.
We may never know whether the transplant would have saved him. But that is not the point. The point is that he was denied the chance to try. His case stands in stark contrast to that of 12-year-old Delroy Moses, whose family was also thrust into a desperate race against time. Moses needed urgent, life-saving endovascular surgery costing approximately $9 million. In his case, the funds were eventually secured, the procedure was done, and he is now reportedly recuperating. That outcome is welcome. But it does not redeem the system it exposes.
Because the question must be asked: why was Delroy Moses’ family forced into that position in the first place?
Why, in a country boasting record oil revenues, did a critically ill child have to depend on bake sales, public appeals, and the goodwill of strangers? Why did the State, with all its resources, contribute only a fraction of what was required? And why did Corporate Guyana, flush with profits from the very economy being celebrated, not step in immediately to close what was, in their world, a negligible gap?
These are not isolated incidents. They are evidence of a structural failure, one in which the government has not made life-saving healthcare a guaranteed right, and the private sector has not embraced its moral obligation to the society from which it profits. The State cannot hide behind partial assistance. A contribution of $1.5 million towards a $9 million emergency procedure is not meaningful intervention; it is tokenism. When the public system cannot provide a necessary treatment, the responsibility does not end it deepens. The government must then ensure full access elsewhere. Anything less is an abdication of duty.
Healthcare is not a line item to be rationed while billions flow into projects of far less urgency. It is not something to be supplemented by charity when convenient. It is a core responsibility of governance. And when that responsibility is not met, the consequences are measured not in policy debates, but in human lives lost. Corporate Guyana, too, must come under scrutiny. The same companies that benefit from tax concessions, state contracts, and the expanding oil economy have remained largely silent when urgent human needs arise. Eight million dollars, seven million dollars—these are trivial sums when distributed across major corporations reporting strong earnings. Yet time and again, families are left to plead publicly while the private sector responds slowly, selectively, or symbolically.
True corporate citizenship is not about sponsorship of events, branding exercises, or carefully crafted statements. It is about decisive, immediate action when lives are at stake. In both the Jupiter and Moses cases, the private sector had the capacity to intervene fully and swiftly. That it did not do so speaks volumes. Some will argue that society itself must bear part of the blame, that citizens did not give quickly enough in Marlon Jupiter’s case. There is truth in that. A more urgent, collective response may well have closed the gap in time. But let us be clear: the survival of a child should never hinge on the speed of public donations. That is not a system, it is a gamble.
A nation cannot normalize passing around a hat to save its children. The contrast between Marlon Jupiter and Delroy Moses is therefore not simply one of death and survival. It is a contrast between two outcomes produced by the same flawed reality: one where access to care is uncertain, uneven, and dependent on circumstance rather than guaranteed by design. Guyana today stands at a crossroads between wealth and responsibility. The revenues exist. The capacity exists. What is missing is the political will and the moral clarity to ensure that no family is ever again placed in the position of begging for a child’s life.
Share this:
Discover more from Kaieteur News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Similar Articles
Website Hits
Blunt of the day
Sports
Features/Columnists
Sir. Ronald Sanders
The GHK Lall Column
Weekend Cartoon
