Latest update September 7th, 2026 10:20 AM
Latest News
- “U.S. grateful to Guyana for helping address migration issues” – Ambassador Theriot
- Ram urges Pres. Ali to ring-fence new oil projects to stop Exxon eating into Guyana’s profits
- Fire destroys house at Ogle
- Iran warns of ‘painful response’ if it suffers further attacks
- Miner dead, suspect on the run after Issano bar fight
GECOM’s administration is not progressive or proactive in the administration of elections
Dear Editor,
In my ongoing introspection of GECOM’s operations, it has become most obvious that GECOM’s administration is not progressive or proactive in the administration of elections. They may well be consciously retrogressive. They have acted conjointly with the government nominated Commissioners and the Chair to stymie many efforts (the introduction of biometrics and the deletion of the names of the dead from the list) aimed at enhancing the electoral processes.
My belated realisation is GECOM’s in-action to provide for workers on the oil rigs to be able to vote by proxy, as is provided for Transport and Harbour workers; or by postal ballots, as provided for the joint services, and non-resident Guyanese. When approached on this matter GECOM simply reiterated that there is no special provision for those who work on the rigs, other than the employer’s obligation to give them time-off time to vote.
When the law was passed providing for Transport and Harbour workers to vote by proxy, there was no oil industry, but the current circumstances of workers on the rigs are more dire than those that necessitated special arrangements for Transport and Harbours workers. Their number is greater and the feasibility of time off is a logistical and operations nightmare. A progressive GECOM could have simply initiated the amendment of the pertinent legislation for workers on the rigs, over 200 miles off shore, to be treated in like manner to the discipline services, or Transport and Harbour workers.
In that regard, GECOM has repeatedly insisted that the initiation of legislation is not their responsibility. This insistence flies in the face of GECOM’s constitutional responsibility and the legislative provision for GECOM to overcome difficulties. I plead guilty of not raising this matter earlier. However, the reality is that GECOM was confronted with the issue and never addressed its mind to a solution, although solutions are within its reach. Similar to the instance of the incarcerated being disenfranchised, it is of no bother to GECOM. However, the possible disenfranchisement of overseas Guyanese, who are listed, probably dead, or not in-country on E Day is of major concern, although they are known to have been voted for in 2020 and the provision to ensure that they are not voted for does do threaten their entitlement.
Vincent Alexander
GECOM Commissioner
Share this:
Discover more from Kaieteur News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Similar Articles
Website Hits
Blunt of the day
Sports
Features/Columnists
Sir. Ronald Sanders
The GHK Lall Column
Weekend Cartoon
