Latest update September 9th, 2026 10:25 AM
Feb 13, 2022 News
… to also pay to update old Petroleum Law — Min. Bharrat
Kaieteur News – Much has been said over the years with regard the one sided deal—Production Sharing Agreement (PSA) or oil contract—that was inked between the Guyana Government and ExxonMobil Guyana, back in 2016.

Minister of Natural Resources, Vickram Bharrat (right) along with Permanent Secretary, Jocelyn McKenzie
The criticisms levied against the then administration—under whose auspices the PSA was inked with then Minister, Raphael Trotman, at the helm of the Natural Resources Ministry—had reached a point that the then opposition had committed to remedying the state of affairs.
Such was the importance of ‘getting it right’ with Guyana’s PSA Model that the People’s Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C) administration had included it in its last elections manifesto with the commitment to, establish a PSA, “based on industry-wide standards and best practices.”
The purpose, the PPP/C said, “is to ensure that Guyanese receive maximum benefit from these contracts without disincentivising foreign investors in the sector.”
The party had committed to establishing a regulatory framework which is independent of politicians, build strong national capability to hold oil companies accountable, and to verify production and other expenditures.
During the course of scrutiny of the Estimates of Expenditure for this year, the Minister of Natural Resources, Vickram Bharrat, was asked to provide clarity on a specific allocation under this Ministry when Members of Parliament were told that the sum of $22.4M (US$112,000) had been set aside in this year’s budget to meet the outlined objectives.
He was at the time responding to questions posed by his shadow counterpart, the Alliance for Change General Secretary, David Patterson.
According to Bharrat, the substantive Minister for Natural Resources, the budgeted sum under his Ministry for which Patterson was seeking clarity on was in fact monies set aside for the hiring of a law firm.
This, he said, was meant to assist government with enhancing Guyana’s legislative and regulatory framework for the sector, in addition to the revision of the PSAs to internationally recognised criteria and standards.
The objective, he repeated, is to have a model PSA/oil contract for future deals with oil companies operating in Guyana’s Exclusive Economic Zone EEZ, offshore in order to, “bring far more fiscal benefits to the people of Guyana.
“Work will have to continue to ensure we have a model PSA than the Stabroek PSA”
He indicated to the Members of the House that under the provision “we promise to (also) look at the Petroleum Production and Exploration Act of 1986,” saying it needs to be updated, and “this provision will start that process.”
During the discourse, Minister Bharrat lamented that up until recently there had not been any commercial discoveries of hydrocarbon outside of the Stabroek Block by any of the other operators, a situation which changed on Monday last when CGX Energy Inc. announced that it discovered crude in commercial quantities in the Kawa-1 Well in the Corentyne Block.
It would be apposite to note that Vice President Bharrat Jagdeo had last week, subsequent to the announcement by CGX, told members of the media, that government is prepared to rise to the occasion to ensure the model PSA will address issues such as higher royalty rates, the need for ring fencing provisions, as well as those related to taxes.
“CGX Energy Inc. has found oil and there may be now increased pressure because if they move swiftly to production then we will have to get a model PSA in place,” he told members of the media during a press engagement at the Arthur Chung Conference Centre (ACCC) this past week.
The former Head of State was adamant work on the PSA was put on the back burner since ExxonMobil was the lone explorer marking all the commercial discoveries in the Stabroek Block.
According to Vice President Jagdeo, with the CGX discovery, “…there is urgency now to move to a model PSA that would correct many of the things we find are wrong with the last one that was signed with Exxon (the Stabroek Block PSA). And all new entrants would have to subscribe to the new conditions. I don’t want to get into too many details but issues raised such as higher royalty rate, and ring fencing, those have to be looked at. Tax treatment and a whole range of other issues have to be looked at.”
He elucidated saying, “there are about 10 or 11 areas we identified to look at and they have to do with the fiscal terms.”
According to Vice President Jagdeo, when the time arrives, the government would be ready to engage with CGX and its partner, Frontera.
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Sep 09, 2026
2026 Republic Bank CPL…GAW vs. ABF – Guyana lose by 65-runs (Kaieteur News) – Guyana Amazon Warriors had their fairy-tale, unbeaten run this season come to an abrupt end, after the Antigua...Sep 09, 2026
(Kaieteur News) – Empire, in its modern form, seldom arrives wearing a military uniform. It comes dressed instead as an investment banker, carrying a development plan, or as the representative of a multinational corporation bearing gifts in the language of progress. The empire does not always...Sep 06, 2026
By Sir Ronald Sanders (Kaieteur News) – The world has broken the 1.5°C promise it made to its most vulnerable countries. The breach has not yet been recorded on a sustained basis, but the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) says it is widely assessed as unavoidable and likely within the...Sep 09, 2026
(Kaieteur News) – It was just a matter of when. From where they hail. Then, how many of them. Last, what kind of undesirables. They go by the name of ‘deportees’, third country nationals. From the moment the first word of a destination for deportees from the U.S. came up, I...Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: glennlall2000@gmail.com / kaieteurnews@yahoo.com