Latest update September 1st, 2026 10:27 AM
Jul 24, 2021 News
Kaieteur News – On June 22, 2021, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had issued a notice alerting the public that the 2020 guidelines for reviewing and conducting Environmental Impact Assessments were repealed and that in the interim, its EIA Guidelines that date back to 2000 would apply.
After this publication carried an article which highlighted the fact that the Environmental Protection Agency had withdrawn its revised 2020 EIA guidelines a mere six days before it had mandated ExxonMobil’s subsidiary, Esso Exploration and Production Guyana Limited, to conduct an EIA for its proposed US$900M gas-to-energy project, the EPA responded with a media release stating, “The new set of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) guidelines were retracted pending more extensive consultation to adequately reflect the contributions from diverse stakeholders through wider public participation. This action is not related to any project seeking environmental authorisation from the Agency.” In the same press release the agency also stated that “The Environmental Protection Act and terms and scope developed for each project seeking environmental authorisation are what’s important to guide the conduct of an EIA and not only any available Guidelines.”This was said despite the regulator previously communicating that the purpose of the EIA guidelines are “to provide to the EPA, EAB, sector agencies, private sector, NGOs, members of the public and consultants a set of approved guidelines for the conduct and review of Environmental Impact Assessments in Guyana.” Additionally, it had stated prior that the “guidelines are meant to be applied consistently to projects requiring EIAs and allows for transparent decision-making.”
In a July 19 article in this newspaper, Guyanese Environmentalist, Simone Mangal, had questioned the logic behind the EPA’s decision to withdraw a set of guidelines that included new oil industry specific guidelines that were championed by the EPA as being all encompassing, revised and updated mere days before requiring EEPGL to conduct an EIA. She also questioned the EPA’s justification for opting to utilise an outdated set of guidelines from over 20 years ago that fail to speak to a multitude of issues that would have been addressed in the new guidelines. She noted that “the Agency also removed sight of the 2020 guidelines from its website rather than leaving them up in accordance with transparency best practice.”
It is in this regard that Kaieteur News undertook the challenge of finding the deleted guidelines. These guidelines will be available for the public eye from today on the Kaieteur News website.
EPA_Environmental and social impact assessment_general guidelines_pagess 87_2020-compressed
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Sep 01, 2026
2026 Republic Bank CPL… GAW vs. TKR Kaieteur Sports – Shimron Hetmyer dropped a nuke at the Queen’s Park Oval, as his breathtaking 111 not out scorched the Trinbago Knight Riders, who...Sep 01, 2026
(Kaieteur News) – There was a time in Guyana when a child caught reading a book was considered a good thing. Today, if you see a child quietly reading for twenty minutes, you may want to call the police. Something unusual is happening. The child is either studying, hiding from his parents, or...Aug 30, 2026
By Sir Ronald Sanders (Kaieteur News) – For generations, Kenscoff was where people from Port-au-Prince went to breathe. Its cool hills offered relief, and its farmers supplied the capital’s markets. Gang attacks reached the commune in January 2025, but it remained an important barrier between...Sep 01, 2026
(Kaieteur News) – The Aussies are now on the bandwagon. Guyana is a world class mining place. Before the Australians, Americans from Exxon were waxing brightly about Guyana’s world class oil reservoirs. And, before the Australians and Americans, there was the irrepressible Mohamed Irfaan...Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: glennlall2000@gmail.com / kaieteurnews@yahoo.com