Latest update September 21st, 2026 12:56 AM
Latest News
- Banned miner, heavy equipment continues to force way onto Chinese Landing Titled Lands
- TotalEnergies’ offshore project in Suriname on track for first output in mid-2028
- $100M Guyana Development Bank to target small businesses, unlock new financing
- 17 children to undergo heart surgery in Guyana
- Govt. negotiating with Turkish firm for another powership
How can this difference in approach be reconciled?
DEAR EDITOR, 
With respect to the No-Confidence Voting, The APPEAL Court of Guyana has ruled in the APNU+AFC favour.
This decision seems to suggest that there is one set of RULES for Parliamentarians and another set of RULES for the rest of Guyanese in particular with respect to GECOM’s five votes where three is a majority and the APPEAL COURT’s Voting with three votes where two is the majority.
How does the Guyana Appeal Court reconcile the differences in approach used.
Had it ruled that 33 is the majority out of 65 votes casted then there would not be a need to reconcile as three would be a majority out of five GECOM votes casted and two would be the majority out of three Appellate Court Votes casted.
Yours faithfully
Sean Ori
Share this:
Discover more from Kaieteur News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Similar Articles
Website Hits
Blunt of the day
Sports
Features/Columnists
Sir. Ronald Sanders
The GHK Lall Column
Weekend Cartoon
