Latest update June 23rd, 2026 12:40 AM
Latest News
- Bank owned by Venezuelans claims it helped Guyana to finance Wales Gas-to-Energy project
- Canadian firm completes US$352,000 acquisition of historical dataset for uranium project in Guyana
- Six-year-old boy drowns at Edinburgh, Berbice
- Drivers in fatal Providence accident remanded
- Tehran tells Trump the Strait of Hormuz ‘is not your personal casino’ after new threat
How can this difference in approach be reconciled?
DEAR EDITOR, 
With respect to the No-Confidence Voting, The APPEAL Court of Guyana has ruled in the APNU+AFC favour.
This decision seems to suggest that there is one set of RULES for Parliamentarians and another set of RULES for the rest of Guyanese in particular with respect to GECOM’s five votes where three is a majority and the APPEAL COURT’s Voting with three votes where two is the majority.
How does the Guyana Appeal Court reconcile the differences in approach used.
Had it ruled that 33 is the majority out of 65 votes casted then there would not be a need to reconcile as three would be a majority out of five GECOM votes casted and two would be the majority out of three Appellate Court Votes casted.
Yours faithfully
Sean Ori
Share this:
Discover more from Kaieteur News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Similar Articles
THE BLUNT OF THE DAY
Sports
Features/Columnists
Sir. Ronald Sanders
The GHK Lall Column
Weekend Cartoon
