The nation is being held hostage.

Dec 30, 2018 Letters

Dear Editor,

Now that the no-confidence motion has been passed in the National Assembly on December 21, 2018, some, especially members from the ruling parties are questioning what constitutes a majority as prescribed by Article 106 of the Constitution and what is the meaning of “absolute majority.” As we seek to expose this 34 votes “arithmetic amorality” or what the satirical column in Kaieteur News “Dem Boys Seh characterized as “jumbie arithmetic,” we are puzzled by the fact that the government is supporting such sentiments instead of accepting defeat and move on in order to savor our democracy.
In the constitutional context, the term majority acquires its precise meaning in Article 106 (6) which states “The Cabinet including the President shall resign if the Government is defeated by the votes of the majority of all elected members of the National Assembly on a vote of confidence.” So the questions to ask are – Were all 65 elected members present and voted? (YES). Is the word SHALL equal to MUST in this context (YES)? Did the persons who voted were whole individuals (Yes) or were they half of a person (No).
So if that is the case, did a vote of the majority take place to command the APNU+AFC Government to resign forthwith? This question then begs another question – what constitutes this majority?
The Collins Dictionary defines a majority as “more than half”, “the greater part of”. The etymology of the word “majority” corroborates that it was first used in 1550 by the French when they try to message a condition of “being greater than” when comparing things. The French further explained themselves with the phrase “la majorité des électeurs” which means the majority is absolute. To shed light on this concept of absolute we reflect on how the largest democracy in the world conduct themselves with respect to what is a majority.
In the Indian Parliament, they define this absolute majority as more than 50% of the total membership of their house. Their house has 545 voting members. The methodology they use in certifying an absolute majority is that they rounded up the total amount of 545 to 546 and then took 50% of that to derive the absolute majority, which we submit as the mathematical accurate position. Under no circumstances should the rounding up take place at the halfway mark.
In Guyana’s case, an absolute majority is 50% of the total voting members rounded up from 65 to 66. Basic arithmetic will reveal that 50% of 66 is 33. So it is clear that Mr. Nigel Hughes has bungled his interpretation of the arithmetic and while that is unfortunate, it is also understandable; because his forte is not mathematics.
Then there is the concept of “greater than”. Is 33 greater than 32? Clearly, 33 and 32 are not equal. Elementary arithmetic teaches us that 33 is a larger quantity than 32 and therefore is a majority.
But to guide us on this concept let us reflect on scriptures. In the King James Bible in 1 Chronicle 12:29 it says, “And of the children of Benjamin, the kindred of Saul, three thousand: for hitherto the greatest part of them had kept the ward of the house of Saul.” That same verse was interpreted in the Christian Standard Bible as “From the Benjaminites, the relatives of Saul: 3,000 (up to that time the majority of the Benjaminites maintained their allegiance to the house of Saul).”
It is clear that the majority is the greater part of the many parts and that, 33 is the greater part of and is an absolute majority of 65. All this voodoo arithmetic gibberish of a half man and rounding up at the 32.5 mark is nothing else but subjective fiction of dreamers who are neither idealists or realists; but theorists. And most theorists are not objective on facts.
On that note, we end with Matthew 7:15 which states “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves”. However you twist it or turn it, the absolute majority of 65 is 33. Therefore, we call upon the responsible leaders in the government to end this shenanigan and conduct the affairs of the country accordingly. The stakes are very high and this should be taken seriously by those in authority. And while time is of the essence, the acting president certainly does have the power or authority to deal with this issue. The nation is being held hostage and this should not happen.

Dr. Asquith Rose,
Sasenarine Singh,
Charles Sugrim,
Mike Persaud.

Discover more from Kaieteur News

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Latest News