Latest update September 19th, 2026 10:20 AM
Latest News
- Fear of return to home countries, diplomatic hurdles lead U.S. deportees to Guyana – sources
- Guyana’s 2026 oil earnings forecast jumps from US$2.8B to US$6.5B
- Sod turned for construction of new $1.3 billion New Amsterdam Market
- Iranians rally in biggest show of defiance against U.S. since war began
- APNU says 2020 election fraud trial exposing PPP/C’s own irregularities
This Member of Parliament should be asked to explain his conduct
Dear Editor,
I was in the National Assembly on May 8 when the sitting ended some time after 10pm, which is the usual time for debates to conclude. There were occasions over the past two years when sittings went non-stop until 3 am the following day, but MPs had to vote by motion for sittings to go on beyond 10 pm.
On May 8, the Prime Minister notified the House that debates on the opposition motion would end after speeches from two MPs, one each from the Opposition and the Government and that the debate would resume on June 16. All MPs voted in favour of the PM’s motion. I am shocked therefore to learn that PPP MP Anil Nandlall has claimed that a curfew was imposed on the debate and that the debate was “stifled”.
This is not true and I hope Mr. Nandlall would be asked to explain why he has made that attack on Parliament.
Earl Hamilton
Share this:
Discover more from Kaieteur News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Similar Articles
Website Hits
Blunt of the day
Sports
Features/Columnists
Sir. Ronald Sanders
The GHK Lall Column
Weekend Cartoon
