Latest update September 2nd, 2026 10:50 AM
Latest News
- Commission wraps up site visit, prepares Arthur Chung Conference Centre, Liliendaal for M/V Barima public inquiry
- Opposition leader demands ring-fencing of future Stabroek Block projects
- GGMC to crack down on unauthorised sale and transfer of mining lands
- Govt. denies negligence in Mahdia dorm fire
- Cuban construction worker electrocuted; two others critical after scaffold hits live wire
Ogunseye is mixing up his facts
Dear Editor;
I refer to a letter from Mr. Ralph Ramkarran captioned “It was the mistake of the WPA….” published in the SN of July 9th, 2016.
It is most disturbing that one Tacuma Ogunseye seemed to be mixing up his facts and thus I want to point him specifically to the SN front-page article written by Anand Persaud (now Editor but who was then a Reporter) dated October 22, 1992.
People like Dr. Roger Forbes Luncheon and Dr. Rupert Roopnarine, were in the thick of things during those faithful negotiations and are still around today, so why are we not asking them for guidance on the facts.
Rather, a very determined effort is being made to publicly distort these facts? Is this how Ogunseye plan to close his innings? Castigated as a historical revisionist?
Under the 1980 constitution, 53 MPs were directly elected with national seats, 2 MPs came from the National Congress of Local Democratic Organs (NCLDO) through the Supreme Congress of the People, and 10 from the Regional Democratic Councils (RDC). Totaling 65 MPs.
The PPP/C won 28 of those 53 national seats, 5 regional seats and was confident of 1 of the 2 NCLDO seats by the fact that they won 53.5% of the popular vote. This would have brought their total in the Parliament to 34 seats.
Basic arithmetic illustrates that 34 is a comfortable majority of 65.
Under the then 1980 Constitution, any party with 33 seats and more could have formed a government and passed laws in the Parliament.
So let us bury that myth, that the WPA was needed to secure the majority for Dr. Jagan in 1992. The PNC won 23 of those 53 national seats (with 42.3% of the popular vote) and 3 regional seats (totaling 26 seats).
The WPA with 6,068 votes won 1 national seat. That left 1 national seat, 2 regional seats (Region 8 and 9), and 1 NCLDO seat to be decided upon but this process had nothing to do with the PPP securing the majority.
GECOM under Rudy Collins allocated the 53rd national seat to the TUF based on a process of the highest left over votes. The TUF got 0.55 of that 53rd seat compared with the PNC 0.42, PPP/C 0.33 and WPA 0.06.
This entire process was scrutinized by one of Guyana’s most brilliant sons – Haslyn Parris on behalf of the PNC, who had a front seat in the entire process.
Upon winning that one seat, Mr. Manzoor Nadir immediately facilitated a process that allowed Eugene La Cruz from the PPP/C to secure the Region 9 (Rupununi) seat, giving the PPP its 35th seat.
The WPA also reached an agreement with the PPP/C on the Region 8 seat and the remaining NCLDO. The PPP supported the WPA in order for Bagot Paul from the WPA to sit in the Parliament on behalf of Region 8.
In return, the WPA supported the PPP to secure the final NCLDO seats. The final tally from the 1992 elections were – PPP/C – 36 seats; PNC – 26 seats; WPA – 2 seats and TUF -1 seat.
Let the record show that Guyana was saved from Zimbabwean status because sons of Guyana like former President Desmond Hoyte, Rudy Collins, and Haslyn Parris served with the highest level of integrity, professionalism, and honesty during those critical October days in 1992.
Sase Singh
Share this:
Discover more from Kaieteur News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Similar Articles
2 thoughts on “Ogunseye is mixing up his facts”
Website Hits
Blunt of the day
Sports
Features/Columnists
Sir. Ronald Sanders
The GHK Lall Column
Weekend Cartoon
I am confident that Tacuma could explain to this brother that he was not saying that Cheddie depended on the wpa to assume office.
What do you mean by saved from Zimbean Crises. You guys bring this Eurocentric understanding to African issues all the time.