Dear Editor,
I have read the statements made by Ralph Ramkarran, which made reference to a Florida lawsuit that was purely a dispute between business partners, unhappy with one another, as “fraud”.
No claim of fraud ever entered the matter, which was later set aside by a Florida court of Appeals. No customer or member of the public was a party to this civil lawsuit, which solely involved a disgruntled partner who had been ousted for misdeeds.
This partner brought a lawsuit out of revenge.
No charge of fraud ever occurred at all, and it is a vicious lie in my opinion; and by no means the only lie, in my opinion, being promulgated by greedy, self-serving forces seeking unjust gains from a weakened and now deceased victim, Yusuf Mongroo.
He may know no peace, even in the grave, until these wrongs are righted by the light of justice.
Notwithstanding the foregoing does Ralph Ramkarran seriously contend that Sherene Mongroo should not be entitled to her inheritance? Could that be right?
Richard Parisi
Husband of Sherene Mongroo-Parisi