Outdated laws left MV Barima exposed to disaster – Maritime Expert

Aug 03, 2026 News

---

(Kaieteur News) – As the nation continues to mourn the catastrophic July 18, 2026 capsizing of the MV Barima, a comprehensive legal paper authored by maritime scholar Robert C. Millington titled MV Barima and the Maritime Statute Book of Guyana: A Fully Expanded Analysis of Statutory Deficiency in the Law Governing Domestic Passenger Shipping reveals that the disaster was not merely an act of sea, but the predictable result of structural failures embedded in Guyana’s maritime laws. His core finding establishes that the country’s statutory framework left domestic passenger vessels like the MV Barima functionally unregulated regarding modern stability requirements, headcount mandates, and safety management standards. Millington brings domain expertise to his statutory critique, drawing on 39 years of experience across the military, maritime, and logistics sectors.

At the center of Millington’s statutory critique is what he terms “The 24-Metre Gap,” a dangerous regulatory loophole created by conflicting statutory instruments. Under the Guyana Shipping (Small Commercial Ship Safety) Regulations (Reg. 5/2005), safety standards including stability criteria, passenger recording, muster and drill requirements, and safety management systems, apply strictly to vessels under 24 metres in length. Meanwhile, under the Guyana Shipping (Cargo Ship Survey) Regulations (Reg. 6/2005), passenger ships are explicitly excluded. Because the MV Barima measured roughly 40.26 metres in length, it fell directly between both regulations. Consequently, the state-operated passenger vessel carried fewer statutory safety obligations under Guyanese regulations than either a small wooden vessel or a standard cargo ship.

The paper also highlights an institutional conflict of interest within the Guyana Shipping Act (Cap. 49:01). Under Section 3(3) of the Act, for government-owned registered vessels, any statutory reference to the vessel’s owner is legally construed as a reference to the Director of the Maritime Administration Department (MARAD). This statutory deeming creates a direct conflation of roles, as the state entity tasked with enforcing maritime safety rules, receiving defect reports, and issuing detention orders is legally defined as the very shipowner it is meant to regulate.

Further statutory deficiencies span across casualty inquiries, stability rules, passenger headcounts, and penalty structures. Neither statutory casualty regime could function properly because the 1883 Act under Cap. 49:07 excludes State vessels, while Cap. 49:01 Part XVIII makes inquiries purely discretionary with no statutory mandate to publish findings or submit reports to the International Maritime Organization, forcing reliance on a general-purpose Commission of Inquiry.

Regarding stability, the statute relies almost exclusively on load line marks that measure draft and reserve buoyancy rather than weight distribution, metacentric height, or righting levers, meaning a vessel can be above its load line mark and still be critically unstable. Additionally, unlike international standards under SOLAS Chapter III Regulation 27, Guyanese law lacks a clear operational statutory duty mandating pre-departure counts and shore-side passenger logs for vessels of this class, which led directly to chaotic estimates of total passengers. Finally, a severe penalty inversion exists where submerging a load line mark carries a higher statutory fine under the Act than sending an unseaworthy vessel to sea, naturally forcing prosecutors away from negligible statutory fines and toward common-law criminal charges.

Beyond the regulatory gaps, Chapter 13 of Millington’s study raises a critical time-sensitive warning for victims and families seeking legal recourse. Under Section 23 of the Transport and Harbours Act (Cap. 49:04), any civil legal action brought against the Transport and Harbours Department (T&HD) is subject to a strict six-month limitation window, which requires a formal written notice served on the Department at least one month prior to filing. With the casualty occurring on July 18, 2026, the mandatory written notice cut-off falls around December 18, 2026, and the statutory bar expires around January 18, 2027. Millington strongly urges the State to issue an immediate statutory suspension or public undertaking waiving this limitation period so that affected families waiting on the formal outcomes of the Commission of Inquiry are not procedurally barred from pursuing legal remedies.

To prevent future tragedies on Guyana’s waterways, the analysis outlines five urgent legislative and structural recommendations for reform. First, the State must close the 24-metre gap immediately by promulgating comprehensive safety regulations for domestic passenger vessels over 24 metres using existing statutory powers under Cap. 49:01. Second, rigid statutory requirements must be enacted for shore-side headcount verification and passenger lists prior to departure. Third, an independent Transport Safety Board should be established as a multi-modal accident investigation body completely separate from regulatory authorities, modeled after international gold standards like the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). Fourth, Section 3(3) must be repealed to legally separate MARAD from the ownership of State-run vessels and restore regulatory independence. Finally, Guyana should enact accession to the Athens Convention Protocols to modernize passenger rights by establishing strict liability, compulsory insurance mandates, and direct action mechanisms for maritime passengers.

A retired United States Navy Officer, Millington holds a Bachelor of Science in Marine Transportation from the State University of New York Maritime College at Fort Schuyler, and previously served as a Licensed United States Coast Guard Merchant Marine Deck Officer (Unlimited Tonnage) and First Class Ship Pilot (Unlimited Tonnage).

---

• Disaster, Maritime Expert, MV Barima, Outdated laws, Robert Millington

---