Latest update July 15th, 2026 12:35 AM
Jul 15, 2026 Letters
Dear Editor,
Guyana Oil Revenue 2025 is technically: US$100 million, a drop in the US$17.2B bucket
The 2025 Combined Financial Report for the Guyana oil consortium (Exxon, Hess/ Chevron, and CNOOC) show that total revenue is US$17.2 billion; and the total profit is US$12.1 billion.
Given that profits are to be shared equally between the companies and Guyana, it is clear that Guyana and the companies should each receive US$6.1 billion. Additionally, with royalties of 2 per cent of total revenue, which works out to US$344.3 million, this means that Guyana total take home is US$6.4 billion.
However, noting that Guyana pays the taxes from its share for the consortium, this amount (US$2.3 billion) is subtracted from Guyana’s share of benefits (Profits, and Royalties); and it is added to the consortium’s benefits (profits and taxes paid by Guyana). Given these distributional specifications, the total combined benefit for the oil consortium is US$8.4 billion, or 66.9% of the total benefits (US$12.4 billion), compared with US$4.1 billion (33.1%) for Guyana (Table 1).
It should also be stated that this distribution of total benefits of US$ 4.1 billion for Guyana (33.1% of total benefits of US$12.5 billion) is overstated. This is because Guyana’s profit is not US$6.1 billion, but only US$2.1 billion in 2025 (Ram: https://kaieteurnewsonline.com/2026/06/28/part-1-six-to-one-is-not-50-50/). Furthermore, there are additional costs, including amounts for insurance, loss of fishermen’s income, and environmental balance; but the budgets for these cost categories are unknown. When the tax payment for the oil consortium and other cost adjustments are included, along with the other costs, Guyana’s benefit in real terms is reduced from US$4.1 billion to no more than US$100 million (Table 2).
Another troubling outcome of this arrangement is that the taxes (US$2.3 billion) paid by Guyana is greater than the profits that Guyana receives (US$2.1 billion). What is also disconcerting with this arrangement is the fact that Guyana’s share of total benefits (US$100 million) is only 1% of the total benefits (US$12.5 billion), when compared with the US$12.3 billion that is captured by the company. Consequently, Guyana’s share of oil revenue in 2025 is no more than a drop of oil in a US$17.2 billion revenue bucket. The underlying cause for this outcome is not only the tax payment made by Guyana for the company; but the cost recovery formula which inflates the average cost of a barrel of oil and reduces the profit that Guyana receives. This issue will be presented in a subsequent letter, where the cost will be analysed in conjunction with the benefits.
Sincerely,
C. Kenrick Hunte
Joe Persaud
Darsh Khusial
On behalf of OGGN
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Your children are starving, and you giving away their food to an already fat pussycat.
Jul 15, 2026
BBC Sport – Spain are through to the World Cup final after surprising favourites France with a convincing semi-final victory at Dallas Stadium. Luis de la Fuente’s side blunted a France...Jul 15, 2026
(Kaieteur News) – Countries rich in natural resources have frequently suffered from poor governance, rent-seeking elites, and weakened public institutions. Yet there is a danger in reducing a complex economic phenomenon into a simple proposition that resource wealth inevitably becomes a curse...Jul 12, 2026
By Sir Ronald Sanders (Kaieteur News) – Suella Braverman is a former Conservative Party British government minister who turned coat and is now a vocal member of the far‑right political party, Reform. She is the child of Indian parents from Mauritius and Kenya, yet, like many other...Jul 15, 2026
Hard Truths by GHK Lall… (Kaieteur News) – The question has been put to me in no uncertain manner: should President Ali resign? It’s my sabbath, so the answer will have to wait. Also, let this much be said in the open-air: whatever the recommendations I offer my president, it would...Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: glennlall2000@gmail.com / kaieteurnews@yahoo.com