Latest update August 7th, 2026 12:35 AM
Latest News
- ExxonMobil confirms US$55B investment in Guyana recovered
- Eight countries ‘strongly denounce’ ongoing Israeli violations in Gaza
- Father of two killed in accident at Coverden
- Bicycle bandits rob pensioner at gunpoint
- Disciplinary action pending against worker accused of withholding cash grant cheques – Region Six REO says
Beyond the Plantation: Labour Leadership in a US$21 Billion Economy
Dear Editor,
While Mr. Lincoln Lewis remains a tireless campaigner for workers’ rights, his recent missive suggests he is increasingly operating as a non-partisan political operative rather than a grounded labour leader. His rhetoric, though seasoned with the familiar language of “solidarity” and “massa-thinking,” relies on a nostalgic view of trade unionism that seems ill-equipped for the complexities of a modern economy.
Mr. Lewis correctly identifies a sense of alienation among some workers, but he fails to distinguish between absolute and relative poverty. According to World Bank and IMF statistics, as Guyana transitioned toward a high-income economy, the international poverty line for our bracket shifted to approximately $6.85 per day. To suggest that poverty is “escalating” is a disservice to the facts.
Twenty years ago, the struggle was for basic caloric survival; today, the debate is about the pace of wealth distribution. Mr. Lewis ignores the historical reality that in every major industrial revolution, from 19th-century England to modern East Asia, there is a documented lag between skyrocketing GDP and the rise of real wages. This “Engels’ Pause” is a global economic phenomenon, not a Guyanese failure.
The weakness in his approach is most evident in his recycling of the bauxite narrative. He laments the BCGI/RUSAL situation and the “contempt” for workers, yet he offers no modern industrial strategy. It is a masterclass in selective memory to decry current inaction while omitting that during the APNU+AFC’s five-year tenure—a period where Mr. Lewis held significant influence, the fundamental structural issues facing bauxite workers remained largely unresolved.
The data tells a story that Mr. Lewis’s “plantation-style” metaphors conveniently overlook. By the end of 2025, Guyanese nationals held over 50% of all jobs in the oil and gas sector, with local content spending reaching approximately US$743 million. This isn’t “marking time.” We are in the capital-intensive phase of development. The explosion of private home construction and car ownership across the coastline are indicators of an absolute rise in living standards.
Instead of vague calls for “inclusionary democracy,” the trade union movement must focus on the 21st-century technical upskilling required for our people to command the “equal pay” he mentions. With GDP growth projected at 16.2% for 2026, the “poverty” he cites requires a labour movement that understands that real wage growth follows the closing of the “Engels’ Pause” through productivity.
Mr. Lewis’s letter is a relic of 20th-century plantation style agitation. If the union is to truly make us strong, it must start speaking the language of a high-tech Guyana.
Regards,
Dr. Walter H. Persaud
Share this:
Discover more from Kaieteur News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Similar Articles
Blunt of the day
Sports
Features/Columnists
Sir. Ronald Sanders
The GHK Lall Column
Weekend Cartoon
