Latest update June 15th, 2026 1:01 AM
Jun 22, 2016 Letters
Dear Editor,
The rationale Mr. Oscar Clarke offered for pre signing the parking meter contract for embarking on the Mexican voyage at best makes no sense. Other characterization sexist for this kind of talk, but for now let’s stay with ‘no sense’. If you have no money; don’t take the trip. Chances are you’re giving more that you’re taking. It’s an insult to the citizens of Georgetown that an elected/appointed servant would utter these words and still be in office.
Sure, any public servant could talk like that but in their next breath they should be forced to announce their immediate resignation. Any public official, without their resigning the entire government is weakened and loses moral grounding. The moral decay that follows from this ‘I can do what I want attitude’ becomes engraved in the thinking at all levels of society and we begin to understand how all types of anti-social and worse actions becomes rampant in such a relatively small country.
That the Mayor and some other City official would embark on a fact finding trip without an engineer or other technical expert is at best laughable.
This Parking Meter issue has all the markings of a bad deal, among others:
1. No prior City Council discussion and decision.
2. No public discussion
3. No clarity on the financial terms of the deal.
4. The lack of technical details
5. Is the technology appropriate and fitting for the City?
Mention has been made that the City is not spending any money but will receive a projected 20% of collections. Actually you spent more than money you spent the integrity of the City of Georgetown. During my recent trips to Guyana I noted the level of free use of public and infrastructure resources that exists. Of course, the parking space used by motor vehicles is one free issue that the City is attempting to manage in a profitable manner. But, giving an outfit free access to the City and only getting 20% is make us look like one of the Bill’s in those childhood stories told us. (Hint: It’s not sensible Bill).
My sense is that City of Georgetown and the eventual users have not been readied for this type of parking technology. In US most of the jurisdictions where the proposed meters have been introduced have had a history of individual parking meters for some time. Use of the proposed meters would constitute a giant step and is fraught with uncertainty as to the outcome.
Perhaps a more low- tech beginning would be appropriate as the in-person method used to collect market stall rents. City Council and public discussion would bring out the pros and cons to be used in a coming up with an appropriate choice rather than the insularity that has used so far.
Phil Williams
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Your children are starving, and you giving away their food to an already fat pussycat.
Jun 15, 2026
– Joseph 5-fer sets tone Kaieteur Sports – A tense showdown for the series ended last night in favor of the Windies who pulled off a thrilling win by 5-wickets which handed them a 2-1...Jun 15, 2026
(Kaieteur News) – Professor Tarron Khemraj and Mr. Sukrishnalall Pasha have offered a spirited defence of the Guyana Development Bank Bill. Their argument is dangerously wrong. They contend that the Bill erects robust institutional firewalls between the executive branch and credit decisions....Jun 14, 2026
By Sir Ronald Sanders (Kaieteur News) – Small and medium-sized states, from the most vulnerable island nations to more diversified middle‑income economies, have always faced a difficult reality. They have to navigate a world in which power is unevenly distributed and in which the decisions of...Jun 15, 2026
Hard Truths by GHK Lall (Kaieteur News) – I commend Hon Minister of Human Services and Social Security, Dr. Vindya Persaud. She came before the public and faced the music on the decision to keep the sexual offenders’ registry (SOR) closed. It pains me, but commendations for Minister...Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: glennlall2000@gmail.com / kaieteurnews@yahoo.com