Latest update April 18th, 2026 12:32 AM
Latest News
- Guyana paralyzed as Exxon dictates country’s fate – Ram
- Canadian gold company sitting on 4.6M ounces in Guyana looking for local transportation services
- Iran reopens Strait of Hormuz, but says U.S. must end naval blockade
- Democracy at risk if EU EOM recommendations on 2025 elections ignored – APNU warns
- 84 persons with disabilities graduate from technical skills training programme
The shoe on the other foot
Dear Editor,
I refer to a letter appearing in your edition of 16 December, Titled ‘ More on the NBS Managers issue’
All of the letters that Cameron and Shepherd referred to, call for an investigation into ‘WHY WERE THE MEN CHARGED WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE’ and cannot be deemed sub judice as the criminal proceedings are all dispensed with in the courts.
However, why was Cameron and Shepherd silent when the former Chairman who happens to be a lawyer, issued to over 500 members of NBS at a meeting on 8 September, 2007 a written statement containing a set of inaccuracies on the matter which was before the courts?
This statement also appeared in the newspapers. Why did the NBS lawyers also remain silent when at a NBS press conference on 3 August, 2007 and aired on the television, a Director in referring to the Managers said that’ THE PERPETRATORS WERE HANDED OVER TO THE POLICE’. Wasn’t this sub judice, libellous and a contempt of the court?
T. Charles
Share this:
Discover more from Kaieteur News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.