Latest update July 17th, 2026 12:08 PM
Editorial…
Kaieteur News – Over a year ago, this was said in a public forum, “Something has to be done about the use of social media as a weapon against the citizens of this country…A government can stand idly by in the face of such onslaught against its citizens, that government will be failing in its responsibilities.”
The source of those comforting words was none other than Guyana’s Attorney General, Anil Nandlall, SC. It was healthy that Nandlall unstuck his head from below the sand, a worthy achievement by itself. In his second inaugural address, President Ali also spoke of going full blast against those who use social media platforms to attack and heap abuse on citizens. Guyanese could be in for a change in its cybercrime law, and how much of a change will demonstrate the PPPC Government’s sincerity in addressing social media excesses that tarnish those who speak out in Guyana.
The political opposition has its grouping of supporters that are known social media abusers, cybercrime ruffians. Truth be told, the PPPC Government itself has its teams of social media agents that are given a free hand to target and vilify citizens who utilize their constitutionally right to freedom of expression. To be bold enough to share publicly where the government has done wrong is to invite all manner of abuse from those believed to be from deep in the bowels of government. The attorney general was all pious energy in 2024, so he now has an opportunity to step up on his commitment that “something has to be done…” It is likely that the government will do “something”, but as to its implementation, that’s open to question. Unless there is radical change, and a new cybercrime law is used as the spearhead to bring about that change, then Guyanese can expect nothing but business as usual. That is, big speeches from PPPC spokespeople and not much of anything else.
Will a new cybercrime law make a difference? It could, if it is crafted with the comprehensive provisions needed, and with one more aspect following, a nonnegotiable aspect. Such a law must apply across the board at government affiliated, opposition affiliated, and the probably nonpolitically oriented violators of that law.
Anything less will render any cybercrime law that may be in the making not worth the effort expended. What would be the use of the law, its deterrent power, if it applies to some, and it shields some? The onus is on the government as the designer of laws, and the upholders of the law, to stop talking and start acting honestly and meaningfully. In fact, Section 19 of the existing cybercrime law has enough in it that empowers the government to go after those who violate its provisions. The record indicates that the government has been selective in its use of that section of the law against those who attack and revile citizens. If the government has been that reluctant to be the most robust champion of that law, or any of the Laws of Guyana, then what is to be expected of its standards when a new cybercrime law is official?
The Commonwealth has called upon governments to reform regulations so that the sanctity of freedom of expression is protected, regardless of who is enraged. President Ali only recently on his second big day told his assembled listeners that efforts are underway to deal appropriately with those who misuse social media to bring others into disrepute. We think that that is an encouraging development, but only insofar as the government’s efforts do not spare those abusers and violators who are from within its ranks. When the law is applied fairly, then there is much to recommend it. When it is used to target perceived enemies, then it is not the law that is in operation, but a continuation of past, known lawlessness.
Further, no sitting government should ever be involved in violating laws, be they through cybercrimes by its agents, or from regular crimes by its village followers. The PPPC Government may try, but it cannot shake the taint of dedicated platforms populated by dirty social media operators who commit crimes against citizens, but to whom the law doesn’t apply.
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Jul 17, 2026
(Cricinfo) Sir Garry Sobers, the legendary West Indies all-rounder, has died at his home in Barbados. He was 89 years old. Widely regarded by many as the greatest all-rounder and most gifted...Jul 17, 2026
(Kaieteur News) – Georgetown bears the name of King George III, the British monarch during whose reign the settlement acquired increasing importance as the administrative and commercial center of what would become British Guiana. Whatever history’s judgment of empire, the name...Jul 12, 2026
By Sir Ronald Sanders (Kaieteur News) – Suella Braverman is a former Conservative Party British government minister who turned coat and is now a vocal member of the far‑right political party, Reform. She is the child of Indian parents from Mauritius and Kenya, yet, like many other...Jul 17, 2026
Hard Truths by GHK Lall… (Kaieteur News) – The time for sparring is over. So, also, is room for dancing around and dodging. A full, accurate, credible 50 percent of oil profits is now due to Guyana. Exxon must be a partner. An authentic partner with accounts that match. The PPP...Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: glennlall2000@gmail.com / kaieteurnews@yahoo.com