Latest update August 26th, 2026 11:47 AM
Latest News
- Opposition Leader released on $100k bail following Demerara River standoff with police
- Guyana must build refinery to guard against global shocks
- Exxon resumes oil pumping at Liza Unity
- Suriname turns down Guyana offer of alternative ferry
- Family of 14 among Guyanese stranded in Suriname amid ferry service suspension
CCJ throws out application in Harbour Bridge collision matter
Kaieteur News- The Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) has dismissed an application for special leave to appeal a decision in the Court of Appeal of Guyana of Andy Duke versus the Ship MT Tradewind Passion, which crashed into the Demerara Harbour Bridge on 1st December, 2022.
Sections of the Demerara Harbour Bridge that was damaged in the collision.
The application was filed on 19th December, 2024. The reasons for the Court’s decision were issued on 20th January 2025. The applicant, Andy Duke, who was injured while working on the docks into which the respondent ship collided, had obtained a warrant of arrest for the vessel. Following the execution of the warrant, the respondent obtained the vessel’s release by providing security in the form of a letter of undertaking. The High Court ordered the vessel’s release on bail upon lodging the letter of undertaking. The applicant appealed this decision to the Full Court, which was dismissed.
On the hearing of an application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal, that Court refused to grant leave to appeal, finding no merit in the arguments to challenge the High Court’s decision to accept a letter of undertaking as security for the release of the ship. Thereafter, the applicant sought special leave to appeal to the CCJ.
The application was dismissed. The CCJ emphasised that it would only intervene in cases where the Court of Appeal has refused to grant leave to appeal itself when the decision results in a gross miscarriage of justice.
In this instance, the CCJ found no potential miscarriage of justice or egregious error of law warranting its intervention as the proposed appeal was academic, the application was non-compliant with the Caribbean Court of Justice (Appellate Jurisdiction) Rules 2024, and the applicant intended to argue issues that were irrelevant to the application. The matter was determined by Justices Anderson, Barrow, and Burgess. Ms. Jamela Ali SC, Mr. Sanjeev J. Datadin, Mr. Ganesh Hira, and Mr. Samuel Glasgow appeared for the applicant and Mr. Kamal Ramkarran appeared for the respondent.
(CCJ throws out application in Harbour Bridge collision matter)
Share this:
Discover more from Kaieteur News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Similar Articles
hits
Blunt of the day
Sports
Features/Columnists
Sir. Ronald Sanders
The GHK Lall Column
Weekend Cartoon
