Latest update August 25th, 2026 10:20 AM
Dec 10, 2024 Letters
Dear Editor,
ExxonMobil sternly and sharply rebuts Craig Sylvester on accusation of money payments to political parties (Dec 08, 2024). I do not think Exxon directly funds political parties or directly gave money to politicians in Guyana.
But how about rental payments (property) and for services (like car rental or taxis and entertainment) to politicians? There is quid pro quo. Is that not bribery or payment? Does that not lead to influence on political parties by oil companies? There were and are credible reports in media outlets about corruption operations of oil companies globally including in Guyana.
No political party or politician in Guyana would refuse funds, and they have been known to accept unlimited money from businesses and individuals without transparency and accountability. But no political party and or politician would want to directly accept money from Exxon in light of all the negatives in the media on royalty and profit sharing; the country is royally cheated when measured against global norms.
Politicians are paid, it bribed indirectly. Oil companies are known to bribe politicians and political parties and cleverly disguise their payments under normal expenses for rental, food, entertainment, local transport, etc. Exxon personnel patronize certain restaurants and catering halls and use certain caterers. Do they overpay for services? Who knows?
Politicians and the political parties have been soft towards Exxon. Why? The political parties prior to 2015 elections committed to renegotiating the oil contract but have failed to do so. The matter has not even been raised in parliament. Even the audit in which some US$300 million in expenses was in discrepancy for 2018/19 has not been discussed and resolved. That is a huge amount. Audits for subsequent years have not been carried out as yet. When will there be settlement of the discrepancy for the first audit? And when will the other audits occur? And if there is no settlement of discrepancies in expenses, over billing by Exxon, then why have an audit?
What the country would like to know and or see is complete, transparent information on all oil expenses, particularly rentals: How much was spent annually in local rentals from 2018 till now? What buildings or properties were rented and from whom? How much was paid for each rental? How many taxis and vehicles have been rented and from whom? Among the individuals and companies renting to Exxon are current and former politicians from both sides. My investigation reveals more politicians and business people affiliated with PPP, than with PNC and AFC, are beneficiaries of Exxon rental payments. And the amount is staggering in the tens of millions in American dollars annually. And that is how former and current politicians get their cut and make their massive pay day from the oil companies. The middle class and poor are not beneficiaries. And the amount paid to each business owned by politicians would be staggering. A thorough audit would expose the companies owned by politicians and those fronting for them.
There is an exclusive restaurant on Church Street patronized by Exxon personnel; the cost of a meal is beyond the affordability of middle class. The top floor restaurant and the multi-storey building is owned by a high-profile government official. The building is heavily protected. Will Exxon open its book for a full and complete auditing on rental and other payments and to who and when?
If nothing to hide, all oil companies should open their books for a professional audit and provide explanation on every major local expense.
Yours truly,
Nathan Barton
(Will Exxon open its expense payment books? )
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Aug 25, 2026
MOE/Beharry Secondary School’s Under-19 T20 tournament finals…BEI vs. Annandale Secondary Kaieteur Sports – After more than a decade-long absence from the school system, competitive youth...Aug 25, 2026
(Kaieteur News) – The results of the 2025 general and regional elections were a shocker. And anyone who now claims that they predicted the performance of We Invest in Nationhood (WIN) coming should seriously consider going into the fortune-telling business. WIN did not merely emerge from the...Aug 23, 2026
By Sir Ronald Sanders (Kaieteur News) – I have been an advocate of the Caribbean Court of Justice from its conception. In 2015, on the Court’s tenth anniversary, I described its creation as arguably the most significant institutional achievement of the English-speaking Caribbean since the...Aug 25, 2026
(Kaieteur News) – I think that the Hon Leader of the Opposition (LOO), Mr. Azruddin Mohamed, blundered. Three Local Govt seats in hand. One went to the Hon Ms. Amanza Walton-Desir’s Forward Guyana Movement. Good! The second should have gone to the APNU. Would have been reflective of...Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: glennlall2000@gmail.com / kaieteurnews@yahoo.com