Latest update November 11th, 2026 10:25 AM
Latest News
- Pres. Ali refuses resignation of COI chairman despite U.S. revoked his visa
- Australian firm taps $4B Govt. mineral mapping programme for Oko gold hunt
- Marine Superintendent admits MV Barima had flaws
- Caribbean records 13,000 new HIV infections, 4,800 AIDS deaths in 2025
- GECOM Chair defends meeting diplomats
NIS and its complexities
Dear Editor,
The National Insurance Scheme has been in the news for years now, and all for bad reasons.
Recently His Excellency announced interventions that would attempt to address some of the miseries of contributors that have been plaguing the Scheme, but would these satisfy the other complaints experienced by the contributors?
In a discussion recently with some concerned citizens, I was asked to make a public appeal for some alleviation of those currently affected and to avoid “problems” in the future.
The first observation made was that visits to the various offices of the NIS seem to indicate some amount of over staffing, and suggest that a manpower audit be conducted, to conclusively determine if the Scheme would benefit from a restructuring.
The Scheme should also consider an aggressive campaign to inform contributors of the benefits to which they are entitled and the regulations governing such benefits, e.g. that a person cannot be absent from work, the day before sickness benefit is claimed.
With respect to sickness benefits, it is now mandatory for a contributor to have on record a medical condition, BEFORE attaining retirement age, to be able to claim for such an ailment AFTER retirement. It is as clear as on a bright sunshine day that many people, as they age develop sicknesses from which they require treatment, e.g. diabetes. Shouldn’t the regulations be amended to address this apparent problematic situation?
It was also argued that NIS be transitioned to a digital system to more accurately, efficiently and effectively deal with workers’ issues.
Even though NIS has an online platform to have Life Certificates, etc. it is a hassle and time consuming exercise, sometimes in futility to have anyone respond. Forget calling the telephone numbers listed. It’s impossible to get anyone to respond.
A problem affecting contributors for decades has been the accurate number of contributions made by workers. This has more often affects workers in the Private sector, but workers in the Public/Government sector also have less contributions recorded. I personally know persons who have been employed continuously all their lives in the Public sector and at the time of being eligible for a pension, the number of contributions have deficiencies for many years. Something must be done to correct this injustice.
A NIS Board member has commented that some of his colleague members are more often than not absent from meetings, and at least one member, often sleep through meetings. He also said that with the Chairman of the Board, rather than being from the Private sector should preferably be a professional, and NOT aligned.
Another complaint is the non-increase of NIS pensions in recent years, even though many such increases have been made to working persons. Surely, the administration must be aware that some retired persons have ONLY their NIS pensions to survive on. A recent announcement indicated that NIS is in a favourable financial health condition. The Government, while it should be complimented on its interventions, in my opinion, would not achieve the desired results, by just tinkering with changes, but should consider a complete overhaul of the NIS.
Hopefully, those with the authority would take these observations in the spirit in which they are made.
Regards,
Harry N Nawbatt
Share this:
Discover more from Kaieteur News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Similar Articles
Website Hits
Blunt of the day
Sports
Features/Columnists
Sir. Ronald Sanders
The GHK Lall Column
Weekend Cartoon
