Latest update October 22nd, 2024 12:59 AM
Oct 22, 2024 Letters
Dear Editor,
The National Insurance Scheme has been in the news for years now, and all for bad reasons.
Recently His Excellency announced interventions that would attempt to address some of the miseries of contributors that have been plaguing the Scheme, but would these satisfy the other complaints experienced by the contributors?
In a discussion recently with some concerned citizens, I was asked to make a public appeal for some alleviation of those currently affected and to avoid “problems” in the future.
The first observation made was that visits to the various offices of the NIS seem to indicate some amount of over staffing, and suggest that a manpower audit be conducted, to conclusively determine if the Scheme would benefit from a restructuring.
The Scheme should also consider an aggressive campaign to inform contributors of the benefits to which they are entitled and the regulations governing such benefits, e.g. that a person cannot be absent from work, the day before sickness benefit is claimed.
With respect to sickness benefits, it is now mandatory for a contributor to have on record a medical condition, BEFORE attaining retirement age, to be able to claim for such an ailment AFTER retirement. It is as clear as on a bright sunshine day that many people, as they age develop sicknesses from which they require treatment, e.g. diabetes. Shouldn’t the regulations be amended to address this apparent problematic situation?
It was also argued that NIS be transitioned to a digital system to more accurately, efficiently and effectively deal with workers’ issues.
Even though NIS has an online platform to have Life Certificates, etc. it is a hassle and time consuming exercise, sometimes in futility to have anyone respond. Forget calling the telephone numbers listed. It’s impossible to get anyone to respond.
A problem affecting contributors for decades has been the accurate number of contributions made by workers. This has more often affects workers in the Private sector, but workers in the Public/Government sector also have less contributions recorded. I personally know persons who have been employed continuously all their lives in the Public sector and at the time of being eligible for a pension, the number of contributions have deficiencies for many years. Something must be done to correct this injustice.
A NIS Board member has commented that some of his colleague members are more often than not absent from meetings, and at least one member, often sleep through meetings. He also said that with the Chairman of the Board, rather than being from the Private sector should preferably be a professional, and NOT aligned.
Another complaint is the non-increase of NIS pensions in recent years, even though many such increases have been made to working persons. Surely, the administration must be aware that some retired persons have ONLY their NIS pensions to survive on. A recent announcement indicated that NIS is in a favourable financial health condition. The Government, while it should be complimented on its interventions, in my opinion, would not achieve the desired results, by just tinkering with changes, but should consider a complete overhaul of the NIS.
Hopefully, those with the authority would take these observations in the spirit in which they are made.
Regards,
Harry N Nawbatt
October 1st turn off your lights to bring about a change!
Oct 22, 2024
– Sinclair, Bayley, Caldeira also claim Gold medals Kaieteur Sports – It was a golden night for prime Guyanese bodybuilder Emmerson Campbell, who claimed top honours at the 2024 Central...Kaieteur News – The ghosts of 2001 are still lurking around Guyana’s politics. It is like a persistent odour that... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News – There is an alarming surge in gun-related violence, particularly among younger... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]