Latest update August 31st, 2026 10:17 AM
Latest News
- Australian firm begins maiden exploration at newly acquired gold project
- Omai to use HFO generators
- Woman found dead, naked along Philipai trail; reputed husband questioned
- U.S. strikes Iranian rocket launchers on Strait of Hormuz in first military action in weeks
- NA Vendor chopped to head, robbed $250,000
Incorrect impression created by online news article?
Dear Editor
An online news item on the Peter’s Hall properties acquisition ruling, gives the impression the appeal, regarding the timeline for payment of compensation, is for the three properties which compensation must be handed over by September 20 and properties vacated by September 30 (INews September 19).
I was under the impression the appeal was for the other ruling in the same matter handed down by another judge.
If it is the former why appeal? It cannot be reasonable that properties must be handed over and compensation is withheld because it is being appealed.
It is hoped the impression created by the online article is wrong, and compensation as mandated by the court in this regard is honoured within the said time frame.
Sincerely,
Shamshun Mohamed
Share this:
Discover more from Kaieteur News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Similar Articles
hits
Blunt of the day
Sports
Features/Columnists
Sir. Ronald Sanders
The GHK Lall Column
Weekend Cartoon
