Jagdeo must explain the dangerous tripling of the capping stack deployment time

Jul 18, 2024 Letters

---

Dear Editor,

I am most elated by VP Jagdeo’s hullabaloo surrounding the arrival of the capping stack in Guyana, since it finally brings attention to the constant raising of my dreaded concern about the Government’s dangerous tripling of the stack’s deployment time to 9 days from the 3 days decided upon by the Coalition Government and Exxon, which was enshrined into the Payara permit. It also brings further exposure to Jagdeo’s overbearing ignorance about matters he has no right speaking about, and so, would no doubt serve the country well, if he keeps his mouth shut and stop misleading the people.

The capping stack is a very heavy (up to 50 to 100 tons) piece of equipment designed to be placed on top of a well as a lid to stop an occurring blowout when the blowout preventer fails. Its creation came about during the disastrous BP Macondo well blowout which spilled over 5 million barrels of oil for87 days until a ‘makeshift’ capping stack was invented and applied; but has undergone significant advances in design over the past 14 years since Macondo, for achieving early shutoff of such future blowouts. Therefore, anyone without being an oil expert, would immediately realize that the topmost consideration must be, to get the capping stack to the blowout well in the lowest amount of time possible, for any delay could result in over 60,000 barrels of oil spilled into the ocean, each day, as in the case of the Macondo. In his pitiable cluelessness, Jagdeo irresponsibly and uncaringly calls my expressed concern “quibbling”.

Consequently, in 2020, Dr. Mark Bynoe, then Head of the Guyana Department of Energy and yours truly, engaged Exxon in discussions to ensure the minimum deployment time is attained. Exxon first proposed time of 20 days was immediately rejected, to be followed by our doggedness until we arrived at a deployment time of 3 days with the understanding that this could only be achieved if stationed in south Trinidad. Guyana was our preferred choice, but because of logistical reasons, could not come close to the 3-day time. Nevertheless, we directed Exxon to develop a plan where stationing in Guyana would meet or beat that minimum 3-daytime period. The bottom-line is that it was all about the fastest deployment time, no matter from whence it came. Though we were the ones to have first facilitated this equipment, and not Jagdeo, as he has been hot dogging, we found it professionally unnecessary to advertise and create any fuss about it, since was part of our normal duty to the nation.

This 3-day time period was hence, immediately enshrined in the EPA original Payara permit prepared under my watch and signed in September 2020, while I was on leave. Inexplicably, it came to fore that this original permit was secretly modified in June 2023 to triple the deployment time from 3 days to 9 days – a modification with a potential consequence of an additional hundreds of thousands oil being gushed into the ocean in that extra 6-day period. That notwithstanding, that modified permit and the others to follow, also callously removed the requirement for re-injection of the billions of barrels of hot, toxic, radioactive and oil contaminated water, replacing with the dumping of this water into the ocean; and removed the prohibition of gas flaring.

At the same time, the VP has been madly waving Exxon on to continue to recklessly exceed the safe oil production rate as prescribed in the Environmental Impact Assessment; hence, enhancing the chances of an oil spill, while joined at the hip with Exxon to fight against full liability coverage to cover and oil spill, and while tripling deployment time of the capping stack to prolong an oil spill. Is this what Jagdeo ignorantly and uncaringly calls tightened environmental regulations! Is there any more evidence that needs providing to show him to be nothing but a bluff and propagandist who only cares about his self-interest and not about the Guyanese people? I am willing to bet anything that this man has never looked at a permit, so, he shoots from the hip and pulls stuff out of the air, and therefore must not be taken seriously.

It is important to know that a capping stack requires meticulously dedicated attention for its maintenance for readiness without notice. However, it is troubling to note that despite all of the VP’s media hype, the stack is reported to be temporarily stored some place on the East Bank of Demerara, with promises to be relocated to the Vreed-en-Hoop shore base when it is completed. How in heavens name could a critical piece of equipment of this nature be brought into the country and put on show with such fanfare without a sound plan for readiness!!

It also begs the following questions: (1) what is the capability of the temporary stationing to meet the needs for proper maintenance for readiness for purpose? (2) when would it be relocated to its permanent facility and what would be that facility’s readiness for purpose? And (3) most importantly, was the maximum 3-day safety deployment sacrificed to have it brought to Guyana to be stationed in a facility owned by friends, families or favourites? This question is not farfetched when considering that the oil production safety limit is also being sacrificed for greed.

Sincerely,

Dr. Vincent Adams

---

• capping, dangerous, deployment, Dr. Vincent Adams, Guyana

---