The line between constructive nationalism and dangerous extremism is often thin

Dec 08, 2023 Features / Columnists, Peeping Tom

---

Kaieteur News – Days after the results of the referendum in Venezuela were announced, there has been a crackdown against dissents in that country. Part of the crackdown was linked to persons adopting positions that were described as treacherous in relation to the referendum.

The international media is reporting that arrests have been ordered of a dozen Opposition personalities in Venezuela most of whom live outside of the country. They are accused of plotting against the referendum of December 3^rd 2023.

These actions from the government of Venezuela are likely to result on a backlash from the international community. It is now a real possibility that the sanctions, against that country and which were recently relaxed could be reintroduced, unless the present crackdown is reversed.

The actions from the government in Caracas against its opponents demonstrate the dangers which nationalist and patriotic fervor can present to free expression and human rights. These are dangers which Guyana must equally guard against at home.

It is now noticeable that there is a pro-government chorus calling for persons in Guyana to be charged for treason. These persons have been so accused for simply giving their opinions about the situation between Venezuela and Guyana.

While nationalism and patriotism can foster national unity and pride, they do also carry the inherent risk of breeding intolerance and stifling dissent. Recognizing these risks, it is important, during period of heightened nationalism and patriotism, that free expression and individual rights are not sacrificed amidst the nationalist and patriotic frenzy which tends to be intolerant of counterpoising positions.

Nationalist and patriotic fervor are usually aimed to galvanizing support and unity around a common cause. For example, in Guyana, there have been calls for Guyanese to unite in defense of the country’s sovereignty and against the threat posed by Venezuela to the country’s territory.

All day on the state-owned media, the public is regaled with speeches of government officials extolling the righteousness of Guyana’s case and with national songs. But equally there have been shades of intolerance with a stubborn refusal, from certain sections of the media, to brook any criticism of the government.

Nationalism and patriotism can foster unity and sense of national identity. However, the line between constructive nationalism and dangerous extremism is often thin. The risk arises when nationalistic and patriotic sentiments transform into exclusivity, leading to the marginalization of dissenting voices and the suppression of criticisms.

History is replete with instances where unchecked nationalism has resulted in dire consequences. The rise of authoritarian regimes in the 20th century, fueled by extreme nationalist ideologies, saw the erosion of individual freedoms and the subjugation of free expression.

The media as the Fourth Estate plays a pivotal role, a check on power and providing a platform for diverse voices. However, during periods of heightened nationalism and patriotism, there is a risk that the media may succumb to pressure or self-censorship. Such tendencies are emerging in Guyana and can compromise the media’s ability to serve as an objective and independent watchdog.

To counteract this, it is essential to reinforce the importance of journalistic integrity and impartiality. Journalists must be encouraged to pursue truth and hold those in power accountable, regardless of patriotic sentiments. Governments should refrain from manipulating media narratives to suit nationalist agendas, and citizens should actively support independent journalism that prioritizes truth over partisanship.

During period of nationalist fervor, the right to free expression, association and assembly can be endangered by creeping intolerance. Governments may be tempted to enact restrictive measures under the guise of protecting national security or maintaining order. The curtailment of civil liberties, such as increased surveillance, arrests of dissenting voices, or restrictions on public gatherings, becomes a potential consequence. It is essential to emphasize that safeguarding the nation should not come at the expense of the very freedoms that define democratic societies.

In this regard, the media must lead by resisting the temptation towards self-censorship. It must continue to serve as a check on power. The media must defend and safeguard individual rights. It must reject any attempt to curtail freedoms under the guise of national interest.

In times of nationalist and patriotic fervor lies in striking a delicate balance between fostering national pride and preserving individual and civil freedoms. Guyana, unlike what is happening now in Venezuela, must not be allowed to fall victim to intolerance and the stifling of free expression.

(The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of this newspaper and its affiliates.)

---

• crackdown, dangerous, nationalism, Peeping Tom, Venezuela

---