Latest update April 10th, 2026 12:30 AM
Jul 04, 2023 News
Kaieteur News – Child Advocacy centre- ChildLinK has distanced itself from “any actual or perceived involvement in any alleged harassment, fatigue or frustration of the 16-year-old school girl who accused Local Government Minister, Nigel Dharamlall of raping and sodomising her.
The young woman has reportedly dropped the case against Dharamlall sparking public outrage and many have questioned what role organisations such as ChilLink played in managing the young woman while she was in protective custody.
In statement issued on Monday ChildLink said on June 30, the Child Protection Agency and Police requested the Georgetown-based CAC to conduct a forensic interview to complete the investigation. ChildLink said they raised concerns on the apparent breaches of protocols. “Shortly into the interview, the child brought to the attention of the CAC staff that she had already given a statement on the said morning of no further action. The CAC team immediately wrapped up the interview and did not proceed with any questions. No further statements were taken,” ChildLink stated.
The agency explained that Child Advocacy Centre (CAC) is an innovative addition to the services of the Childcare and Protection Agency (CPA) which commenced under the leadership of the now retired CPA Director in partnership with ChildLinK in 2014. “The efficiency and effectiveness of the CAC rest largely on the collaboration of several key stakeholders, inclusive of the Guyana Police Force, Judiciary, Ministry of Health, and local not for profit organizations who manage the operations of the CACs across the ten administrative regions. Key to the success of the CAC services is confidentiality and maintaining the best interest of the child. ChildLinK is currently delivering CAC services in six administrative regions in Guyana,” the agency noted.
“In the current case of sexual abuse allegations against a Government Minister, we wish to clearly outline the role of ChildLinK as part of the investigative apparatus. The various disclosures that have been made regarding this young woman’s posture and position on this matter are regrettable and none can be attributed to ChildLinK including her last statements,” ChildLink stated.
The agency said while it would have preferred to maintain its usual and resolute discreet position in this case, “we are constrained to respond to the concerns of the public regarding ChildLinK’s role in this matter.” ChildLink said the confidential nature of the CAC is fully understood by the organisation and has never been in question. “We have observed all protocols with key stakeholders requiring the services of the CAC over the years and to date have never breached this practice. We understand the gravity of this current case and the immense mental stress this child has and continues to endure. This places a greater responsibility on ChildLinK to respect her dignity and that of every child who participates in our programme.”
ChildLink stated that over the years its professional practice including work in the CACs has been consistent and respected by all stakeholders. “We have provided our services with integrity and the critical work of others involved in providing CAC services has been respected by ChildLinK. The accusation of leakages in this current case is troubling, ChildLinK maintains that it has acted professionally in all of its involvement in this case.”
The agency boasted that over the past almost nine years, the CACs have conducted more than 4000 forensic interviews. “These statements were submitted to the relevant authorities to decide on prosecution. The delayed prosecution has often times resulted in children withdrawing their reports. In cases where children withdraw from the process, it is important that they receive significant psychosocial and legal support to ensure that they clearly understand the legal process. Children who withdrew have expressed feeling pressured and don’t wish to be publicly reminded of the abuse, among other concerns. We at ChildLinK believe that far too many responsibilities rest on the victims to provide the evidence of this crime. Therefore, all stakeholders should work assiduously in the best interest of the child and for the child’s safety and to stop the systemic abuse against victims.”
ChildLink said the operations of the Child Advocacy Centres (CAC) are a global model for responding to the critical concerns of sexual abuse perpetrated against children and young people. The CAC is an international best practice and an evidence-based approach that many countries in the developed and developing world are utilizing collaboratively with their local NGO partners to provide a more comprehensive response to children who report cases of sexual abuse.
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Your children are starving, and you giving away their food to an already fat pussycat.
Apr 10, 2026
Kaieteur Sports – Cricket West Indies Masters Association (CWIMA) has announced that His Excellency Dr. Mohamed Irfaan Ali, President of the Co-operative Republic of Guyana, has agreed to serve...Apr 10, 2026
(Kaieteur News) – There was a time when things were used as they were intended. A fork for eating and a bed for sleeping. I am told that in the old days, when there was a global oil crisis and petrol prices rose, motor racing was gently but firmly discouraged. Not outlawed, mind you but quietly...Apr 05, 2026
By Sir Ronald Sanders (Kaieteur News) – The Caribbean has not set out to loosen its trade dependence on the United States. It is being driven to do so. For generations, Caribbean importers and consumers have looked first to the American market. They have done so for reasons of preference and...Apr 10, 2026
(Kaieteur News) – I rarely talk about what comes out of the White House, the Dept. of Justice, and the US, in general. Indeed, President Trump has done that well with the American brand, savaged it so much, made it into a football for the world. A man of sorrows, he is. But what of his...Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: glennlall2000@gmail.com / kaieteurnews@yahoo.com