Latest update April 7th, 2026 12:30 AM
May 21, 2023 Letters
Dear Editor,
150 years ago, the world had other values. They thought that pollution could be solved by garbage collection. The concept that our lifestyle choices eventually affect us gradually sank in with the development of laboratory chemistry and biology. But only in the last 50 years has a new subject called Environmental Science been created. Our own UG did not manage that until 30 years ago, and only in this century did CXC get into the act.
Life began to be valued, monetarily: more highly by the rich for the rich than by the poor for the poor. (The social scientists can study various combinations of how the rich value the poor and the poor value the rich). As education spread, the poor began to recognise the inequities and are trying to push back against exploitation, only sometimes violently responding to the imposed continued violation of their spaces. In Guyana, we are fortunate to have some wise judges in the judicial system, who can begin to redress inequities and reduce the burden of responsibility on the ordinary people, whose economic outputs would have to be used to repay any debt.
There has been what the scientists call a ‘paradigm shift’ in values during the 150 years the study of natural sciences developed and became available to the ordinary person. There is now increasing precedent for damage to the environment to become quantified as much for the poor as for the rich. More and more people are becoming aware of the value of land and ecosystems.
The BP Macondo oil well blowout is a well-known example of spiralling costs. People are valuing their living space and livelihoods more and we can no longer say some things are unprecedented. Our judges can now give consequence to the recognition that things are not the way they were when the rich could dictate their values to a poor, supposedly sovereign country and not be liable for damages in excess of any insurance cover they may have. Guyana and the Caribbean should be entitled to claim as much as, say, litigants in the USA would be able to get.
Technology has also advanced, learning from each mistake, so it is unlikely that previous mistakes will be repeated. Therefore, it should be easier to safeguard guarantees to poor Guyana. Parent companies cannot hide from their responsibilities in the developed countries so they should not be allowed to do so in Guyana. Since our Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has allowed itself to become pliant, signed parent company guarantees will keep the oil companies and their shareholders vigilant to ensure safety. Most ordinary Guyanese would like the oil to be exploited by the best qualified oil companies in the business, but fairly.
Alfred Bhulai
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Your children are starving, and you giving away their food to an already fat pussycat.
Apr 07, 2026
By Rawle Toney Kaieteur Sports – Guyana concluded its campaign at the 53rd CARIFTA Games in St George’s, Grenada, with an impressive haul of six medals (four gold, one silver, and one bronze)...Apr 07, 2026
(Kaieteur News) – There is a peculiar habit in public life. It is the tendency to mistake custody for ownership. It is a small confusion, almost innocent at first glance, but like many small confusions it grows into a large misunderstanding. Recently, the Government, in designating fifty-seven...Apr 05, 2026
By Sir Ronald Sanders (Kaieteur News) – The Caribbean has not set out to loosen its trade dependence on the United States. It is being driven to do so. For generations, Caribbean importers and consumers have looked first to the American market. They have done so for reasons of preference and...Apr 07, 2026
(Kaieteur News) – Ever hear about Doubting Thomas? Those who didn’t should consult with their Bibles. Guyana has tons of Doubting Thomases and should be in the Guiness Book of World Records three times. Once as a land trapped in endless doubt. Twice, as a country warped by chronic...Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: glennlall2000@gmail.com / kaieteurnews@yahoo.com