Latest update June 20th, 2026 1:58 AM
Latest News
- Lindsayca routing US-millions for foreign workers through payment firm, allegedly dodging tax and labour laws
- Exxon refuses to tell Guyanese cost of Ogle HQ being paid for with country’s oil
- Citizens Bank opens new branch in Bartica
- Israel kills ‘a child a day’ on average in Gaza despite ceasefire, UN says
- President Ali unveils bold plan to hand Guyanese greater stake in mining industry
Is this stance meritorious?
DEAR EDITOR,
The work of an important parliamentary oversight committee is held up as the opposition holds firm in its stance that the former chairman of the same committee, who had several charges before the court, was not removed or asked to resign, so they continue in having faith and confidence in their chairman.
But is this stance meritorious? The former chairman had charges leveled based on decisions which emanated from cabinet. Further the incumbent did not benefit in a personal way from the actions undertook at the time in carrying out a legal cabinet decision.
Counter pose that against the current chair who benefitted in big, personal ways from public funds, on several occasions, which did not follow procedures and by extension was illegal.
To continue in its current stance is counterproductive, as we saw and experienced for five long months.
And what of the former junior minister who also benefitted from public funds in an illegal way?
Shamshun Mohamed
Share this:
Discover more from Kaieteur News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Similar Articles
THE BLUNT OF THE DAY
Sports
Features/Columnists
Sir. Ronald Sanders
The GHK Lall Column
Weekend Cartoon
