Latest update November 10th, 2026 6:38 PM
Latest News
- 13-year-old girl missing after reportedly entering canter at Mahaicony
- Godfrey Smith offers to quit MV Barima CoI after U.S. visa revocation
- ‘Spy Chief could face attempted murder, firearm charges’ – Legal sources
- Bill seeking unlimited benefits for former presidents to be debated tomorrow
- Pentagon war chief Hegseth expected to face House impeachment vote this week
Is this stance meritorious?
DEAR EDITOR,
The work of an important parliamentary oversight committee is held up as the opposition holds firm in its stance that the former chairman of the same committee, who had several charges before the court, was not removed or asked to resign, so they continue in having faith and confidence in their chairman.
But is this stance meritorious? The former chairman had charges leveled based on decisions which emanated from cabinet. Further the incumbent did not benefit in a personal way from the actions undertook at the time in carrying out a legal cabinet decision.
Counter pose that against the current chair who benefitted in big, personal ways from public funds, on several occasions, which did not follow procedures and by extension was illegal.
To continue in its current stance is counterproductive, as we saw and experienced for five long months.
And what of the former junior minister who also benefitted from public funds in an illegal way?
Shamshun Mohamed
Share this:
Discover more from Kaieteur News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Similar Articles
Website Hits
Blunt of the day
Sports
Features/Columnists
Sir. Ronald Sanders
The GHK Lall Column
Weekend Cartoon
