Latest update August 15th, 2026 10:49 AM
Feb 23, 2020 Features / Columnists, Hinds' Sight with Dr. David Hinds
In a week’s time, Guyanese go to the polls for the 15th time since achieving self- government seven decades ago. As is the case with ethnically divided countries around the world, our elections, except for the first one in 1953, have all been moments of discord and conflict, which have more often than not spilled over into the post-election period.
In short, elections in Guyana have not solved our deep-seated historical problems. Rather, they have only exacerbated them to the point where anxiety and fear often precede them.
We have also had our fair share of crooked elections, which have left a long shadow across the political landscape. The memory of that era is often used as a mobilizing tool for one section of the ethnic electorate. For another section, there is either silencing or denial. In recent times, both sides have made charges and countercharges of rigging, but it often sticks on one side. The force of historical memory is still very strong.
There was a time when radicals argued that elections were not a means to a revolutionary end. We saw elections as more democratic form than substance. The overthrow of the old order could not be done via elections, we contended. But as time passed and revolution slid into the past, elections have taken on new meaning—it is now part of the new revolution.
And, so here we are on the eve of perhaps the most consequential election in our history. It is difficult to ignore its presence. The campaign rallies have been huge, largely because the two big contestants have for the most part bussed their supporters to the locations. The platform speeches have been short on substantive policies, but long on that which stirs the crowds to partisan frenzy. For those who pay close attention to the saner side of our politics, it is no secret that the mega-rallies mask a deep sense of alienation among the voters.
Yet for all the alienation, I have argued in this column and on the platform that skipping the polls is not an option at this juncture. Yes, one may be guilty of encouraging people to vote, with full knowledge that the election outcome would not lead to any immediate fundamental change in the way in which we have approached governance, especially as it relates to the distribution of common resources.
What then are we asking people to vote for? I sought to answer that question by asking voters to use their vote as an investment in the future. But the investment must not stop with the vote. The people of this country, especially the poor, must be prepared to fight their leaders after the election for that future. This is what I think is lost on those who berate me for supporting the Coalition, after my serious and sometimes extreme critique of them during their first term.
I still believe that the ultimate outcome of political struggle must be revolutionary change or what we loosely call transformation. But we live in an era in which there is no appetite for political contestation outside of the ballot box. The ballot box in these post-radical times, then, becomes an arena for more than just returning governments to or throwing them out of office.
In these times when political parties in the Caribbean have little or no ideological differences, making electoral choices are most difficult. I have looked at the manifesto of both the PPP and the Coalition, and I am hard pressed to find any deep, ideological thread running through them. They list what they will do if they win, but there is nothing that binds the items together.
But vote we must. I have already said that I don’t think the newer parties would make much of a difference to the two-way race between the PPP and the Coalition. In any case, as I said before, I don’t think a minority government would lead to a movement away from the zero-sum politics we are fighting to overcome.
I am for power sharing as the ultimate road to a solution. And Coalition politics is a significant step in that direction.
(The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of this newspaper)
More of Dr. Hinds’ writings and commentaries can be found on his YouTube Channel Hinds’ Sight: Dr. David Hinds’ Guyana-Caribbean Politics and on his website www.guyanacaribbeanpolitics.news. Send comments to dhinds6106@aol.com
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Rising Debt, Rising US Dollar Rate in Oil-rich Guyana!

Aug 15, 2026
By Rawle Toney (Kaieteur Sports) The Bayroc National Stadium in Linden has emerged as Guyana’s only track and field facility currently listed as certified by World Athletics. According to track and...Aug 15, 2026
(Kaieteur News) For months now Cuba has been under U.S. pressure. It is being starved of the resources it needs for energy in the face of the collapse of its electricity grid. And only a handful of individual and groups in Guyana have been brave enough to come forward and to condemn the imperialist...Aug 02, 2026
By Sir Ronald Sanders (Kaieteur News) – Daniel Ortega has now said openly what his regime has demonstrated for years: the people of Nicaragua are not to be permitted to remove their rulers through elections. During celebrations marking the 47th anniversary of the Sandinista Revolution, Ortega...Aug 15, 2026
Hard Truths by GHK Lall (Kaieteur News) I think that CCJ President, Dr. Winston Anderson, has only one option. My recommendation is that he tenders. From what is now concretised in the public record, most likely throughout the region, he is radioactive. If the allegations were from one colleague, I...Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: glennlall2000@gmail.com / kaieteurnews@yahoo.com