Latest update November 7th, 2026 10:20 AM
Sep 15, 2018 Features / Columnists, Peeping Tom
Teachers should pay close attention to the ongoing talks between their union and the government in order to select an arbitration panel to decide on wage increases. Teachers should insist on being consulted, directly, and on having an input into the union’s position regarding the nominees for the arbitration panel.
New reports last evening indicated that no agreement was reached between the Guyana Teachers’ Union (GTU) and the Ministry of Education over the appointment of a Chairperson for the arbitral panel. The impasse at one meeting should, however, not be the source of worry for teachers.
Teachers should be more concerned about the criteria which the union is using for its nominees. According to reports on social media, the GTU nominated three persons two of whom had served as Ministers under previous PNC administrations while another had worked in a senior position within the State Planning Secretariat alongside former President Desmond Hoyte.
The nominees of the union are all over 60 years, have all at one time of the other worked for PNC governments and are all of the same ethnic group.
The Ministry of Education is reported to have proposed two persons, one of whom is a sitting Permanent Secretary and the other is attached to the Guyana Revenue Authority. The union wisely rejected these names on the grounds that it does not prefer to have persons who are presently employed. No ‘fit and proper’ East Indian has yet been nominated. But perhaps that will be forthcoming in the second round.
It was also reported that agreement has been reached on additional terms of reference for the arbitration. One would have presumed that the logical course of action would have been for both parties to have finalized the full terms of reference before moving onwards to the selection of the panel.
After all, how would both sides know that they have found a suitable panel unless they know what exactly are the terms of reference of the panel? On the assumption that both sides would have contacted their nominees to ask whether they would consent to being on the panel, how did either side approach these nominees when discussions are still taking place on the terms of reference?
Teachers have to pay close attention to what is taking place here. They should demand that the union publicly declare the terms of reference which have so far been agreed upon, the sums which are to be paid to those on the proposed arbitration panel and the time frame which has been agreed upon.
Teachers already have reasons to worry. The union has unwisely admitted that it was prepared to accept a 20% offer, a confession which will prejudice its case in the arbitration.
Teachers should also be concerned about the actions of the government. Why would a government which is fond of establishing criteria about impartiality and independence have nominated persons who are presently in the employ of the government? The government could not have reasonably expect that the union would have agreed to persons who are presently employed by the government.
Teachers therefore should impress on their union to first decide on the criteria which the members of the arbitration panel should satisfy, before selecting names. What criteria is the union demanding?
What constitutes a ‘fit and proper’ person for the arbitration? Should the person be a judge, have judgelike qualities or be qualified to be a judge? What would the union consider as an impartial nominee?
What happens if there is no agreement on the members of the arbitration panel? Is there an agreed-upon mechanism to break the deadlock? Has the Carter formula been considered in which the union will be asked to submit six names not unacceptable to the Ministry of Education for one to be selected as Chairman. Or will the two sides continue to make nominations indefinitely until an agreed person is found.
These are some of the questions which teachers should demand of their union. There is something very mysterious going on both sides of the negotiating table. Some strange things are happening! Teachers had better take note!
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Nov 07, 2026
(Kaieteur News) – The field will be a packed one on Sunday November 29, at Rising Sun Turf Club when the President’s Cup horse race meet shoots off. More than 100 horses have thrown their names...Nov 07, 2026
(Kaieteur News) – Who says the government does not listen? That is an unfair accusation. The government does listen. In fact, it listens very attentively. The only problem is that it appears to have a rather selective hearing. It can hear a whisper from certain quarters of the private sector...Nov 01, 2026
By Sir Ronald Sanders (Kaieteur News) – When Commonwealth leaders gather in Antigua and Barbuda from 1st to 4th November, they should address a question that reaches beyond their association: how can countries of different size, wealth and outlook sustain cooperation in a world increasingly...Nov 07, 2026
(Kaieteur News) – U.S. Vice President, J.D. Vance is among the first bailing from a sinking ship. The Iran War led to the ashes of defeat in the midterms. President Trump suddenly sheds his crazy man persona. Now talks of working with Democrats. From America I wing to Guyana, and Vice...Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: glennlall2000@gmail.com / kaieteurnews@yahoo.com