Latest update June 20th, 2026 1:58 AM
Latest News
- Lindsayca routing US-millions for foreign workers through payment firm, allegedly dodging tax and labour laws
- Exxon refuses to tell Guyanese cost of Ogle HQ being paid for with country’s oil
- Citizens Bank opens new branch in Bartica
- Israel kills ‘a child a day’ on average in Gaza despite ceasefire, UN says
- President Ali unveils bold plan to hand Guyanese greater stake in mining industry
Was this a backdoor deal?
Reading the tax concessions granted to Exxon Mobil will bring tears to your eyes. It is an indictment against an administration that railed against the previous government, and in total opposition to what it indicated when it got into office.
One of the first things that the government did was to cap benefits paid to the former President, indicating that it did not agree to uncapped benefits. It also expressed concern about the uncapped concessions granted to companies.
Yet, it is the same government which has handed Exxon Mobil tax concessions that are deductible from government’s share of profit oil. This effectively shortchanges workers who should be benefitting from the taxes to be paid by Exxon.
The government was expected to have driven a stronger bargain when it came to taxes. It was not expected to be that generous.
The Minister of Finance announced that upon assuming office, he found a tax system that was so characterized by high rates that it led to innumerable requests for tax exemptions and concessions. The value of those concessions alone totaled $55 billion, in 2014. (See Kaieteur News article captioned “GRA must tighten up on monitoring of concessions”, of January 10, 2016.
According to the Minister, “In short, the system is broken and we must fix it in a comprehensive manner – one that results in a transparent and predictable tax system that rewards effort, promotes investment, improves our national competitiveness, and removes distortions between and across sectors.”
In wrapping up the Budget debates in 2017, the Minister of Finance is quoted as saying that “I want a tax code that is uniformed and uniformly applied.” The granting of waivers and concessions were said to have weakened the tax system.
Against this background of concerns over the volume and value of tax concessions and waivers granted to companies, and in the context of the expressed desire to see a more uniformly applied tax code, it was expected that the government would have taken urgent steps to cap open-ended concessions to companies.
The contract signed between Exxon and the government, however, nails any such intentions. The tax concessions granted to Exxon are not only open-ended but they are a public scandal.
The agreement provides that except in certain specified instances, no tax, value-added tax, excise tax, duties and fees shall be levied against Exxon with respect to income derived from its petroleum operations or with respect to any property held or transactions undertaken. This proviso effectively hands Exxon a tax holiday in relation to its petroleum operations.
Article 15.2, however, subjects Exxon to comply with the income tax laws. It obligates the company to file returns, assessment of taxes and to keep and show books and records.
The “killer” proviso is, however, Article 15.4. Under this proviso, the Minister, meaning the Minister of Natural Resources, agrees that a sum equivalent to the tax assessed will be paid to the GRA on behalf of Exxon and that the amount of such sum would be considered as income to the contractor. In other words, instead of Exxon paying income tax, the Guyanese taxpayers will have to foot this amount out of profit oil.
How can any government have approved such a concession? Would it not have been better to have gone to the National Assembly and announced that Exxon would not be paying a blind cent in taxes?
We are subjecting Exxon to the income tax laws of Guyana. We are compelling them to file returns and assessments. Yet, it is the taxpayers of Guyana who will have to pay these taxes from government’s share of profit oil. In other words, instead of this portion coming to taxpayers, it will be written off against the company’s tax liabilities.
It is incomprehensible that the present Cabinet could have approved such an agreement. It is time for someone to level with the Guyanese people and confirm what is suspected: this agreement did not have the blessings of the full Cabinet. It was a backdoor deal. Was it?
Share this:
Discover more from Kaieteur News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Similar Articles
4 thoughts on “Was this a backdoor deal?”
THE BLUNT OF THE DAY
Sports
Features/Columnists
Sir. Ronald Sanders
The GHK Lall Column
Weekend Cartoon
They should be sent to hell….they who are selling out this country. The wealthy countries of this world are those that placed ‘country’ first. Who the hell are these people running our country?
Suggest an alternative, Pam.
The incompetency in this APNU+AFC administration continue on a daily basis to bend over backwards to EXXON/MOBIL to the point where it is now high handed ‘stupidness’. Their total lack of commonsense is mind boggling.
Are these guys for real ?? The so-called minister of natural resources needs to have his head examined by a competent shrink for God’s sake !!! The whole bunch of them need to be sent packing come the next election but the alternative is even worse since we know their history … may God help the struggling masses of Guyanese !!! The younger generation needs new visionary leaders but I am sure most of them, if they have sense enough are headed overseas. The Guyanese ship is sinking and there is no one around to save it … what a pity !!!!!
And why is it that the parliamentary opposition are so silent about this?