Latest update February 22nd, 2025 2:00 PM
Apr 27, 2012 Letters
Dear Editor
Columnist, Freddie Kissoon, wondered aloud in a recent column whether I supported the view that the vacancy on the Guyana Elections Commission should be filled by the AFC. The answer is easy–Yes. I think that both the APNU and the AFC should be guided by the principle of inclusivity and national consensus.
If the PPP is not ready for national consensus, then it is incumbent on the two opposition parties to set the example by placing that principle at the center of their political behavior. As the bigger entity, the APNU has to lead the way in this regard. So I do not see how the appointment of a third PNC person would advance the cause of national consensus.
Having said the above, I understand the politics on this issue. I can understand the APNU’s skepticism about agreeing to an AFC nominee, given the not so pleasant experience with the late Robert Williams, who did not always stand with the opposition side. Hence there is the temptation to go for someone whose loyalty can be guaranteed.
If they do not choose an AFC person, a compromise candidate should be a non PNC-non/non-AFC person acceptable to both parties. In this regard a person from one of the smaller parties in the APNU or a so-called Civil Society person would suffice. There are several worthy candidates in this category. But my first choice would be the AFC person.
David Hinds
Feb 22, 2025
Kaieteur Sports- Slingerz FC made a bold statement at the just-concluded Guyana Energy Conference and Supply Chain Expo, held at the Marriott Hotel, by blending the worlds of professional football...Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- Time, as the ancients knew, is a trickster. It slips through the fingers of kings and commoners... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Ambassador to the US and the OAS, Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News-Two Executive Orders issued by U.S.... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]