Latest update January 10th, 2025 5:00 AM
Dec 09, 2024 Letters
Dear Editor,
As one of the founding members of A New and United Guyana (ANUG), I congratulate its new chairperson Dr. Mark France and its new executive committee. Mark has been in the party from almost the inception and I assessed him to be a principled, feisty and ambitious individual. These are admirable qualities for one wishing to contribute to the development and democratisation of Guyana. But as we are seeing daily, these qualities will not flourish if the process of institutional and other forms of accountability is non-existent or very weak.
If the past statements of ANUG are of any worth, it came into the race for government with an admirable understanding of its context and what was required to modernise and propel Guyana’s socioeconomic development. But I will argue in this and the following article that from their recent utterings, it appears to me that Mark France and company are in danger of being suffocated by the party’s existing political direction, which focuses on what is relatively unimportant and thus needs a major reset based upon the understanding that ANUG is now a group with its own history and baggage.
I will use this article to give the public some indication of how ANUG viewed itself in relation to its context before the 2020 elections, and the next to argue for a general reset that should contain required shifts in policy and process, if the party is to make a serious contribution to the development of Guyana.
The political competition in Guyana is not the same as it is in the largely homogeneous countries of the Caribbean Community. Suriname is the exception and a classical multi-ethnic society, and there the winner-takes-all political system has been constitutionally prohibited. In Guyana, even before independence, identity politics based on ethnic differences had coalesced into a political cleavage between Africans and Indians that has allowed one to easily predict electoral outcomes that leave one ethnic group at the mercy of the other. While this is clearly an undemocratic arrangement, there are three commonplace political approaches: efforts to protect ethnic governmental power by maintaining the status quo, demands for inclusiveness and constitutional reforms and a utopian reactionary multiethnicity aimed at ethnic political assimilation.
ANUG chose the second approach and having noted the negative role ethnically-based political divisions and parties have played in Guyanese history, and that the then existing APNU+AFC coalition government had not fulfilled its mandate to reform the system, it argued that such political behaviour has ‘us all wanting to believe that political promises mean nothing’. It rejected that kind of behaviour and to demonstrate its seriousness promised the following:
Our party undertakes that it will never enter a coalition with any other political party or any of its members for the purpose of securing a role in government.
From the first day of taking constitutional office, or being able to otherwise influence governmental policy, we will persistently work to establish shared executive government and within one month of being able to do so we will set about the constitutional reform process to make the necessary changes in the Constitution.
We hereby make these two main commitments legally enforceable. By this, we mean that any citizen or group of citizens will be able to go to the court for the appropriate declarations that we have violated either or both commitments. If the court rules against us, we make a legal commitment to resign from Parliament. If these issues are not justiciable, our first order of business, after we win the elections, will be to make them so’ (‘A New and United Guyana: Unity is our cry; Unity is our goal’ 2020).
In another 2020 publication, ‘Vote for ANUG on March 2 to secure a United Guyanese Nation’ the party promised it would:
Sincerely,
Dr. Henry Jeffrey
(Suggesting an ANUG reset)
Jan 10, 2025
SportsMax – While arguing that news of a pending proposal to introduce a two-tier Test cricket system could merely be a rumour, Cricket West Indies (CWI) President Dr. Kishore Shallow pointed...The unconscionable terms, The unconscionable terms Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- The Production Sharing Agreement (PSA)... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- It has long been evident that the world’s richest nations, especially those responsible... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]