Latest update February 13th, 2025 1:56 PM
Oct 04, 2024 Letters
Dear Editor,
In his letter Mr. Charles states that when he enquired from
GuySuCo what the new Skeldon project was all about, he was told that they were going to plant 1500 hectares of cane there, sic, and transport it 30 miles by road to Albion by trailer. Editor, properly grown canes from 1500 hectares would amount to around 112,000 tonnes
of cane! We keep doing the same nonsense over and over again wasting precious national resources simply to buy votes and enrich politicians.
Editor in 2016 they closed Wales factory, the farmers who were supplying almost as much cane to the Wales factory as the
GuySuCo fields, were then told to take their canes to Uitvlugt factory less than two years later most of those farmers abandoned growing cane. This happened since the additional distance to be traveled from Wales factory to Uitvlugt [about 20 miles] was too far to be
economical. These were existing farmers, not the kamikaze new farmers that are now invited to grow cane at Skeldon and make huge losses. In his letter the writer alludes to a milkman and a mansion, and there is abundant evidence that not only this milkman, who has presided over more than one disaster at GuySuCo, but still continues to be elevated within that organization, but others who were
removed for several transgressions, even fraud, continue to operate.
As far as the preparation of the lands at both Albion and now Skeldon are concerned, whatever the cost is, I have a few very burning questions/problems about it.
I am not even going to elaborate on my contention that the Ministry of Agriculture,[ MOA] is doing more for corrupt contractors rather than for the farmers, the sugar industry and the people of Guyana.
Finally Editor, the current Director General of the MOA also chairman for GuySuCo, referred to by Mr. Charles, was he not the same Mandanlall Ramraj (PPP Central Committee Member) who was charged with thirty two counts of fraud at the Guyana Rice Board by a
person like Professor Clive Thomas then in charge of Special Organized Crime Unit (SOCU) ? In seeking to find out what happened, I discovered that 16 of the charges were thrown out, when on 11th October 2018, as reported in the Stabroek News, due to the
nonappearance of superintendent of SOCU Sheronie James, who was testifying in another SOCU matter in the courtroom of the Chief Magistrate, the SOCU’s request for a further date was denied by the magistrate and the matter thrown out of court.
Editor these 16 charges were not properly handled by the prosecution and fell apart. No one established that this man was not guilty of the offences, I’m not sure what happened to the other 16 charges, but this is the man now in charge of a bigger portfolio at the MOA and
97 billion dollars with a minister like Mustafa! When I was four years old my mother taught me about circumstantial evidence “where there is smoke there is fire” putting such persons in charge of big money is fraught with danger. This is the government created by Mr. Jagdeo.
There was no corruption with the Jagan government prior to 2000, today, invoking Cheddi Jagan’s name and reputation at every opportunity, Jagdeo has built one of the most corrupt governments anywhere on this planet. His calling for less corruption in procurement now, is just his usual pappy show!
Sincerely
Tony Vieira
Feb 13, 2025
2025 CWI Regional 4-Day Championships Round 3… -GHE (1st innings 87-4) Blades 3-15 Kaieteur Sports-Guyana Harpy Eagles were put on the back-foot early thanks to rain, coupled with a fiery spell...Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News-Later this year, you will arrive in Guyana as protectors of the integrity of our democracy.... more
Antiguan Barbudan Ambassador to the United States, Sir Ronald Sanders By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- The upcoming election... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]