Latest update January 8th, 2025 4:30 AM
Jan 06, 2024 Letters
Well, well the saga goes on! The appeal in that NIS pension matter is given a double speak (so to speak). On one side, it is a criminal offence for employers’ not to remit deductions to NIS. On the other side, and in this particular case, the employer was not a party to the case and if the ruling is allowed to stand NIS could become bankrupt (Newsroom Jan 3). Such legal logic and reasoning.
So the question is why didn’t the judge think and order the employer be joined to the case? Was it because the evidence against the employer and state agency was overwhelming? Is Mr. Zainul to be made collateral damage over a perceived legal technicality?
Why can’t NIS honour the court ruling and then sue the employer to recoup the entire judgement? Will justice be served in this matter during Mr. Zainul’s lifetime?
Sincerely,
Shamshun Mohamed
Jan 08, 2025
The Telegraph – The England & Wales Cricket Board will meet with officials from the International Cricket Council at the end of January to discuss plans for a radical new two-tier system in...Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- The Horse Racing Authority Bill of 2024, though ostensibly aimed at regulating horse racing... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- It has long been evident that the world’s richest nations, especially those responsible... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]