Latest update April 11th, 2025 9:20 AM
Dec 22, 2023 Letters
Prime Minister Dr. Ralph Gonsalves’s motif for convening the get together between Presidents Maduro and Ali was questioned. Anyone who has read and or followed Gonsalves would know that he has had a long positive history with Guyana and a consistent advocate of Caribbean interests. He stands unique among Caribbean politicians in his qualifications– economist (BA, UWI Mona), political scientist (MA Mona), progressive, trade unionist (PhD Manchester), lecturer (UWI Cave Hill) and lawyer (Inn’s Bar London). He has been a lifelong ‘Jaganite’, admiring the late leader (since the 1960s) for his socialist credentials and has not deviated from left wing ideology. And he consistently championed democracy in Guyana from 1966 thru 1992 and again in 2020. As such, he was/is not someone who would compromise the interest of the region or that of Guyana for self-interest.
Remarks were made about benefits and recognitions received by his country and several other CARICOM states and or their leaders from Maduro, imputing those as motifs for their presence in the St. Vincent meet. It is noted, for example, that several Caribbean states (Dominica and St. Vincent included) had their (PetroCaribe energy) debt cancelled of by Venezuela. Dominica was relieved of US$100M and St. Vincent US$70M debt. The PM of Dominica, Roosevelt Skerritt is the Chair of CARICOM. Several other CARICOM members (including Belize) have their debt renegotiated and or some forgiven. Prime Minister Mia Mottley was recently honored by Maduro with that country’s highest national civilian award. Prime Minister, Dr. Keith Rowley of Trinidad and Tobago has an agreement for gas and a percentage of revenues from the nearby Dragon Field block in Venezuela. It is impossible to ignore benefits as motivation for wanting to maintain good relations with Venezuela.
In the international political system, as students of political science (Foreign Policy 101 or International Relations 101) learn, all nations act in their best self-interests. It is not different from (most) politicians acting in their self-interests to fill deep pockets. Yes, Caricom states benefited tremendously from Venezuela over the last couple decades with purchasing ‘cheap’ oil with payments deferred. Thus, they can’t simply forget Venezuela’s generosity and back Guyana; it is called realpolitik. Otherwise, they would be considered as ungrateful. At the same time, Guyana is their long-time regional partner and can’t abandon it in times of need or distress. They would prefer not to have to choose sides in the controversy. Thus, they must pursue a balanced relationship of self-interests between the two neighbors turned new adversaries. It is in Caricom’s as well as ECLAC’s interest in bringing ‘nemesis’ together so that the good friendly relations they enjoy with Venezuela and or with Guyana are not impacted.
Besides economic interests, nations also have an overriding concern to maintain their region as a zone of peace. Any violence between states would have devastating (economic and social) consequences in the region and beyond.
Thus, it is inherently wrong to impute that Dr. Gonsalves only had self-interest in bringing the two nemeses together in his nation for talks. It was a high-level meet with high level attendance to guarantee its success. Dr. Gonsalves is interim Pro-tempore chair of ECLAC, a position that rotates and which comes to an end in 2024. As Chair of Caricom, Dominica PM served as co-host of the meet with other heads and other invited guests serving as interlocutors. The invitees included representatives of UN, Brazil, and Honduras, among entities. Gonsalves merely took the initiative to write the two Presidents to meet and discuss the controversy. He was the right person to take the initiative since he chaired ECLAC to which both Guyana and Venezuela as members; Venezuela is not a member of Caricom. Gonsalves served as a host for the talk with himself and other invitees serving as interlocutors assisting to broker peace.
Gonsalves is not a ‘selfish’ politician like several others from the region. He has consistently demonstrated care for the region and its people. Anyone who has been around like me and have studied Caribbean politics from the 1970s, long before the current crop of regional politicians and academics, would know the name Ralph Gonsalves. His name appeared in the region’s mass media as well as in academia (journals and books) long before he became a politician in mid-1990s and PM since March 2001. He has been an outstanding writer and great speaker. He penned several articles on the region and published a few books. His name appeared in Caribbean Contact newspaper to which I subscribed from the late 1970s; its editor was Guyanese Rickey Singh, the former Guyana Graphics editor who was driven out of his country by the authoritarian Forbes Burnham.
Gonsalves and Singh had a close friendship. Gonsalves was also a political activist; when Walter Rodney was expelled from Jamaica, Gonsalves, as head of the Students Guild, led fiery protests at MONA campus and in Kingston. He also spoke out against Rodney’s denial of employment at UG and his assassination by the Burnham dictatorship. He supported the Maurice Bishop coup in Grenada in 1979 and condemned the PM’s murder in 1983. These can be verified from Contact archives and in magazines such as Caribbean Perspectives. Gonsalves supported the left-wing movement in the region. And he was a close comrade of the late trade unionist and activist Tim Hector of Antigua in their struggle against exploitation of the region’s working class and what they called ‘neo-imperialism’.
My first personal encounter with Gonsalves was at City College of NY where I was an elected Senator in the Undergraduate Day Student Government (1978 to 1982) that hosted his lecture. I met him multiple times thereafter in Guyana, Trinidad, St. Lucia, Antigua, and elsewhere. Gonsalves was a visiting Professor at Queens College of CUNY for a year and in Spring 1980, with Vassan Ramracha as elected Treasurer, the CCNY DSG at my tabling a motion for funding co-sponsored a Caribbean Conference where Gonsalves, Joey Jagan, Arjune Karshan, and a host of Caribbean intellects made presentations at Lewisohn Lounge south campus. (Chuck Mohan was there but I can’t recall if he spoke). There, Gonsalves and I exchanged views, and he publicly condemned electoral fraud in Guyana and spoke out against Caribbean authoritarianism. He praised Cheddi Jagan for his peaceful struggle for restoration of democratic rule in Guyana. He described Jagan as “a socialist giant” in the region and a Caribbean hero who was respected by all comrades. Subsequently, Gonsalves would endorse the description accorded Jagan by then Prime Minister Maurice Bishop as “Dean of Caribbean Socialism”.
So in his relations with Guyana, Gonsalves did not come across as someone pursuing selfish interests. He cared for democracy, peace, development, and the working class. Instead of criticizing him, we should praise the intent of Gonsalves to invite the leaders of Guyana and Venezuela to come together to talk about the border controversy. And we must commend Gonsalves and other regional leaders as well as the representatives of ECLAC, Brazil, and the UN to be closely associated with the meet that has brokered peace between Guyana and Venezuela even for a short period. The meet would help to strengthen partnerships between and among states as well as continuing the long period of peace and security in the region.
Yours truly,
Vishnu Bisram
Apr 11, 2025
-Thrilling action unfolds on Day Three Kaieteur Sports- The courts at the National Racquet Centre (NRC) were once again buzzing with intensity on Wednesday as Day Three of Moo’s National Junior...Kaieteur News- A protest organized against the Office of the Commissioner of Information, Charles Ramson SC, will continue... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- Recent media stories have suggested that King Charles III could “invite” the United... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]