Latest update January 3rd, 2025 4:30 AM
Mar 28, 2023 Letters
Dear Editor,
The GHRA of today is far removed from the organization that was formed in 1979. This point was clearly made by General Secretary of the PPP, Bharrat Jagdeo at the Cheddi Jagan memorial event at Babu Jaan on Sunday. While no one doubts that GHRA played an important role in exposing the sustained attacks on human rights in Guyana under Burnham and the PNC, it must be noted that the organised had changed beyond recognition since those days of endemic state repression.
It is especially important to notethat the old GHRA was not a one-man show at that time. The organization was active and impactful becausemany distinguished Guyanese leaders were active in the organization. Among them were Ashton Chase, Gordon Todd, N.K. Gopaul, Fr. Malcom Rodrigues, Maulvi Azeez, and others. These stalwarts represented a cross section of Guyanese society known formilitancy against the authoritarian PNC. All of them were dedicated to free and fair elections, a matter of national survival, given that by 1979 the PNC has mastered electoral banditry.
The strength of the old GHRA was not on account of one man. If fact, when GHRA was formed Chase, Todd, Gopaul, Maulvi Azeez and Malcom Rodrigues had already established a track record of fighting the dictatorship. Ashton Chase, of course, was a founding member of the Political Affairs Committee and the PPP, and had by 1979 earned the reputation as a brilliant and steadfast champion of the labor movement. He was Minister of Labor in Cheddi Jagan’s first government in 1953. Gordon Todd was the leader of the powerful Clerical and Commercial Workers Union, with strong groundings in the urban areas. For Chamanlall Naipaul, Gordon Todd “was one of those principled, fearless, unflinching and uncompromising advocates and leaders in the struggle of the working class, and indeed a true patriot and son of the soil” (Guyana Chronicle, 1/5/2007).
N.K. Gopaul,a courageous and battle-tested anti-dictatorship fighter, was General Secretary (and later President) of the National Association of Agricultural, Commercial and Industrial Employees (NACCIE). GHRA also benefitted from the presence and leadership of Jesuit priest, Fr. Malcom Rodrigues, who was also Head of the Physics Department at UG, and later Vice Chancellor at the same institution. And, among many others who shored-up GHRA, there was the reputable architect, Albert Rodrigues, and the Muslim leader Maulvi Azeez, from West Coast Demerara.
During the heydays of the anti-dictatorship struggles against the PNC, therefore, the GHRA had multiple people who had long track records in human rights, and deep connections to the society. They were also active players rather than mere names on a piece of paper (or website). They pulled no punches, but instead took the fight against the extant machinery of repression.
That is a far cry from what exists as the GHRA today. The organisation now has been reduced to a single voice, something that should never happen in an organisation that is intended to protect human rights. The current GHRA has become too politicized, and there is widespread belief that it is biased towards, and a cover for, a small clique of Georgetown elites, along with some overseas academics who have only peripheral connections to Guyana. The GHRA is so dysfunctional because of one-manism that issues of human rights can be bent, ignored, or simply dismissed.
Sincerely,
Dr. Randolph Persaud
Jan 03, 2025
Lady Royals and Kanaimas to clash for Female championship Kaieteur Sports- The inaugural Kashif and Shanghai/One Guyana National Futsal Championship, which kicked off at the National Gymnasium with...Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- The sugar industry has been for centuries Guyana’s agricultural backbone. Yet, its struggles... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- The year 2024 has underscored a grim reality: poverty continues to be an unyielding... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]