Latest update December 19th, 2024 3:22 AM
Mar 11, 2023 News
– PPPC, APNU+AFC cut from same cloth of “negligence, slackness, and squandering of the people’s patrimony”
Kaieteur News – Following his analysis of the accounting procedures in the 2016 Stabroek Block agreement, Chartered Accountant and Attorney-at-Law, Christopher Ram believes the US$160M bill for ExxonMobil’s Ogle Headquarters is not cost recoverable, unless, special permission was granted by the former or current government.
Ram believes that it was Natural Resources Minister, Vickram Bharrat or his predecessor, Raphael Trotman that provided Exxon with the requisite approval. In any event, he posited that the public deserves to know who committed this act.
Ram addressed this matter in his latest column, “Every man, Woman and Child in Guyana Must Become Oil-Minded Part 104” that was published in the Stabroek News on Friday. He recalled that it was Opposition Member of Parliament (MP), Ganesh Mahipaul, who tabled a question in the National Assembly on whether the cost of the HQ was recoverable.
Ram also noted that ExxonMobil’s Country Manager, Alistair Routledge, emboldened by his increasingly comfortable relationship with the People’s Progressive Party Civic (PPPC) Government, reacted to Mahipaul by declaring that the approximately US$160M would be recovered using Guyana’s oil.
In reviewing the contractual provisions that state what costs are recoverable, Ram said there is no mention that a headquarters to be used by a single contractor is fair game.
He did note that there is one loophole which may have been utilized. In this regard, Ram said the contract allows the recovery of “Other Costs and Expenses incurred by the Contractor in the conduct of the Petroleum Operations” but subject to the approval of the Minister. Ram said the only outstanding question left is the identity of the Minister that implemented this provision.
Ram said the issues surrounding the Ogle Office are not only financial. He said the land it sits on also bears several concerns. He said ExxonMobil’s subsidiary, Esso Exploration and Production Guyana Limited (EEPGL) has sub-leased from Ogle Airport Inc. (OAI), ten acres out of the hundreds of acres of land leased from the Government to OAI for airport development.
Ram said there are two “clearances” which were required to make this legally possible. “One, OAI needed approval for subletting the land for non-airport purposes and two, by virtue of section 333 of the Companies Act of Guyana, Esso needed a licence, authorised by the President no less, to hold land in Guyana,” the lawyer stated.
He then questioned, “Was it President Granger whose Administration sleep-walked into signing arguably the worst oil contract in the petroleum world in the modern era, or President Irfaan Ali whose PPPC Government in 2012 birthed the model for the infamous 2016 Petroleum Agreement, and which has failed at every opportunity to protect, promote and defend Guyana’s interests ahead of those of the oil companies?”
He alluded that this is another critical question that the citizenry deserves to have answered.
Taking the foregoing into consideration, Ram in closing said, “…There is no doubt that when it comes to maladministration, negligence, slackness and squandering the people’s patrimony, not even water, let alone oil, separates the PPPC from the APNU+AFC.”
Dec 19, 2024
Fifth Annual KFC Goodwill Int’l Football Series Kaieteur Sports-The 2024 KFC Under-18 International Goodwill Football Series, which is coordinated by the Petra Organisation, continued yesterday at...Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- In any vibrant democracy, the mechanisms that bind it together are those that mediate differences,... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News – The government of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela has steadfast support from many... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]